enyce and guanxi and … chen dongfan

Fall, 2009 


Note – this was a couple of months after I began teaching full time in Hangzhou, so I was being sensitive to … everything.  Food, clothes, manners.

Ju la, or as it is sometimes written, Ru la, is an American-sixties style restaurant in the hills of Hangzhou. Chinese food, Chinese patrons, but the design is all exposed and rough-cut wood, with American nineteen-fifties advertising posters on the walls and tables that are enormous rough hewn blocks.  It is very popular, especially on Sundays.  It is a custom to go to a restaurant on Sunday, take a table, and spend two or three hours or more eating and drinking and talking.  No waiters hustling you out as you take your first bite of dessert.  It is Sunday, the one day of rest.

Ju ra       Trip Advisor – Restaurants Hangzhou

I told you about Ju la before.  It is set in the very pretty Hangzhou hills, surrounded by tea farms and trees. Birds flit and sing just outside the open windows.  We sat on the second floor, in one of the private rooms by a window with a big tree outside and some vines overhanging the window.   There were many small birds, about three inches long, with orange tops of their heads, sort of bluish bodies, and white underbodies.  Tiny and chirping and having fun. Flitting in and out of the vines and the trees.  They looked like birds somebody painted up for a Chicago Bears game, in blue and orange.

Inna Xu Yi Yin and I already had plans to go there for lunch, to plan her assault on the Hangzhou government to support young Chinese artists, as she has been doing herself for some years.  Try as she might, she could not get the Hangzhou government to support any of her artists, in any way.  She did not want money, but access – to galleries, to media, to public exposure.   I told her I knew some people in the Cultural Bureau, which is the Bureau that put on the Hangzhou Reading Festival, and maybe they could help.

As it turns out, Mr. Xiao Jun from the Cultural Bureau called me on Friday, and asked me to go with him on Sunday for lunch.   So I put the deal together for us all to meet at Ju la.

Mr. Xiao and his son picked me up at 9:30, and we drove to Ju la.  His son is 9, and has been taking English for a year.   It is pretty good, certainly better than my Chinese, and I understand my role in these events is to be the Foreigner Who Speaks English, to help the kid, let him talk with an actual meiguo (American), and not so incidentally keep up the English skills of my host.

We got some tea, and waited for Inna to come.  I brought my learning-Chinese language book (the middle school daughter of a friend of mine looked at the book and sniffed, huh, first grade).  But we exchanged words and ideas and talked about the New China (with the dad, not the kid).  Inna got up late, and called three times in the 45 minutes we waited to assure us that she was on the way.

It is probably not necessary to describe the clothing styles.  Mr. Xiao is a good guy, spent 2007 and 2008 at Nottingham getting a Master’s degree.  He is a good and smart public servant, and was dressed casually in a grey long sleeve sweater and nice pants.  His son had gym shoes and sweat pants and a down vest, also blue and orange, and a red sweater with embroidered raised enyce on the front.  Ms. Inna rushed in, a little out of breath, in her uniform.   Slightly worn blue jeans with colored patches carefully sewn into the carefully designed rips in the legs, a multicolored rope belt, and a charcoal grey turtleneck.  A black leather vest.  Imperially slim, with the frizzed hair and the huge smile and the doe eyes.  Faye Dunaway.  The room, at least, shifted.

We did introductions and ordered corn juice.  I told you before about corn juice.   Mark my words, it is coming to the US.  Hot or cold, still good.  I suppose you could add a shot of Jameson’s, if the vitamins in the corn juice were not enough.  Anyway, at this point in the lunch my role was to talk with Mr. Xiao’s son, and watch, and get caught up every now and then when someone stopped for breath. 

Inna was describing her philosophy of life, the needs of young artists in Hangzhou, her work over the last few years in doing just that, purity vs. commercialism in art, and what she would like for the future.   Mostly Mr. Xiao listened, but countered with some philosophy of his own, some perspective on government support for the arts, and advice on what to do next.

I think I was in this same meeting in Chicago about 1977 – many times.   Then, it was about storefront theaters or outdoor seating in restaurants.   Informed, reasoned, but passionate case-making on one side, and well, we have to be careful, we don’t have that much money, what might happen, and we have to follow the guidelines on the other.

Don’t get me wrong.  I think we met with the right guy.  Mr. Xiao and I had talked before about the need to change the government approach to thinking, and schools, and innovation. Mr. Xiao was my guide for the Hangzhou reading festival event, where I received the gift of books from  the vice mayor of Hangzhou, so we had spent some time together.   But he was saying what an interested and helpful bureaucrat would say.

Every now and then, I would chime in with some Wisdom about Development from America.   The role of theaters in economic development in Chicago.  The concept of an arts incubator.  Government support for artists does not mean supporting the meaning of the art, it is support for the whole of the economy of Hangzhou.  Hangzhou as the cultural center of China. The standards of measurement for art- a key issue for Mr. Xiao – were unavailable.  Van Gogh was not terribly successful during his life.   Once dead, the value of his art zoomed.  So the measure of the success of art is the death of the artist?  The only quantifiable measure is the market.   There is little difference between a reading festival and an arts festival.  Both are designed to get people to think differently about their world.   La Villita Little Village in San Antonio, as an arts colony that became a tourist destination in town.  The stated goal of the central government to increase tourism to China over the next few years (2018 note – this was in 2009).  The reason why the government should do this (or something) is that some amount of failure is expected.  If success could be measured, if the externalities were few, then a private business could do this (whatever it is).   That success is measured over twenty years, not two months.   So the government role in supporting the development of the artists is a natural economic consequence of the nature of the good, art.   In twenty years, Hangzhou will be thankful it started something now.

My role was to be the objective foreign voice.  I couldn’t think of anything else.

Mr. Xiao was talking about the usefulness of soft power, another central government idea that is floating around now.  That the arts are a form of soft power.   I asked his son to open his vest, showing everyone the enyce on his sweater.   Neither Mr. Xiao nor Inna knew what that meant, but I explained, and demonstrated the soft power of NYC, regardless of the commercial origin of the sweater.   So Mr. Xiao understood.

We all left about 2:30, Mr. Xiao to drive me back to school and Inna in her white Range Rover.   The next step is for Inna to meet with the No. 1, the Party leader, in the Cultural Bureau.  He would make the final determination about access.

All in all, not bad for a Sunday afternoon sitting next to Inna with the Government across the table.   So Ju la is where I brokered my first deal.  I not only know what the word guanxi means, I think I have it, and have now used it. 

Postscript – About a year later, Inna got a commission for her star young artist, Chen Dongfan, to decorate the exterior of two buildings in the neighborhood of Liu Xia, the town in Hangzhou about three miles from ZUST, my school.  Inna now has a gallery and studio space in Hangzhou and a gallery in New York  Inna Contemporary Art Space  and Chen has exhibited in shows across Europe.    Pictures of the building art below –

Chen dongfan, the author, and Brenna, my daughter –  May, 2011

 

 

You can see more of Chen’ work at –

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/chen-dongfans-mural-on-doyers-street-1329968

and the work at Inna’s studios –

http://www.innart.org/en/

http://www.innart.org/en/artist/about/7b6eww.html

Inna at linked-in   https://www.linkedin.com/in/inna-xu-67818b66

The Mysterious Parking Garage Market

Tea party activists and Randians and market fundamentalist miss some things about the real world.   One is the distinction between free markets and competitive markets.  Free markets are for one-off deals with buyers and sellers who don’t know each other, have equal power in the market, will not see each other again, and don’t convey any information about the transaction to the rest of the market.  One-off deals are the métier for people like our current dear leader.  Except for the equal power in the marketplace bit.

All competitive markets have some rules.   Rules evolve, perhaps without the intervention from government regulation, and the system works repeatedly.   Supply shows up, demand shows up, demand and supply are satisfied, and markets clear.

This is a good story.   There are some details that get glossed over, however, and one of them is in whose interests the rules of the market are written.  And this is really about power – not just market power, but sometimes physical power or power to withhold service or power to delay.

Fundamentalists on these matters can claim that even the rules of the market are market-driven – that is, there is some discussion, bargaining, negotiation, over the rules. 

And that is true.   As long as supply needs some demand, there must be a way to make the demand come back the next time.   So “market-friendly”  rules consider some of the needs of the buyers in the market.

But, caveats.  Sometimes, the supply in the market does not create its own demand – Say, as we say, is wrong.   Say’s Law    (Yes, I know, Say was talking about a general glut of products, and later changed his view.  Here, I am only concerned about a general glut of parking spaces, with waiting demand, and … the market fails to work).

Sometimes, the supply could not care less about demand, because the supply exists for reasons other than to meet demand.   We don’t always see the reasons, but they certainly exist, even if shrouded in mystery.  Sometimes, artists just like to make art.  But there can be more prosaic reasons that excess supply exists in the presence of obvious demand.

Parking garages near the Hangzhou Pregnant Women’s Hospital are a good example.    The hospital, and two other big hospitals within two blocks, are all located close to xihu, the big lake that is the focal point of Hangzhou.   This is not really downtown, in the sense of lower Manhattan downtown, but it is Columbus Circle downtown, in terms of people on the street, taxis, bikes, motorbikes, buses, trucks, with the added challenge that it is China, and only free market rules about which side of the road to drive on, or walk on, or just stand still on.

There are thousands of people, sick, healthy, family, friends, doctors, nurses, garbage trucks, food supply trucks, medical supply trucks, all trying to get into or out of the hospital in the period 6:00 AM to 10:00 AM.

It is fair to say that parking for cars is limited.   In all of our visits to the area, and to the hospitals, I have found only two real public parking lots within, say, a mile.   There is other parking, but it is only for customers of a particular hotel, or restaurant, or business.    General public parking, for those who want to visit xihu, or go shopping on the street, or go to the hospitals, is tough.   The Pregnant Women’s Hospital does have a designated parking garage of its own, but that is for doctors and administrative staff.  Husbands of women who have already given birth are also allowed to park there.  One of the benefits of having a baby.

The two public lots – actually, they are one big underground lot, with two levels and entrances and exits on opposite sides of the street –  are very convenient to the hospitals – about a block away from all three hospitals.   And if you get there by 6:30 in the morning, you can drive right in, find a spot (there are plenty of parking lot attendants to guide you to empty spots on both levels) and be on your way.   But by 7:30 or so, the parking lot management decides to limit demand satisfaction – to ration supply.   They block off the entrances, and limit access to one car every few minutes, from 3 to 10 minutes per car.

One could understand some reasons to ration demand, if spaces are reserved for doctors, or hospital use, or something.  But even doctors come to work by 9:00, or 10:00, and the parking lots are still limiting entry, and the doctors would have no other way to get into the lot other than sitting in line with everyone else, so such a rule makes no sense.

I mean, it really makes no sense.   At 7:30, or 9:00, or 10:00, there are plenty of available spaces inside the garage.   Many.  Scores, to hundreds.   With no one parking in them.   During the course of the workday, the garage never comes close to capacity.

The parking is not free.   Not expensive, but you might think that the market rules in this case are being written by the forces of supply in the market, and the rules are written to maximize profit.    But that is clearly not the case, with so many available spots and dozens of cars lined up, around the blocks, in two lines, one line for each entrance, waiting to get in.    The wait to get into the parking lot, at 8:30 in the morning, ranges from 45 to 90 minutes.  (see note 1, below)

So there must be some other rule being observed, or some other principle maximized.

Maybe the parking lot management wants to raise fees, and is waiting to build demand before implementing a rate change.   But with so many cars waiting outside, every day, for months on end, that makes no sense.

It is China.  Maybe spaces are being reserved in case Hu Jintao (this was written in early 2012) or somebody, wants to come inspect the parking garage, and there will be 50 or 100 spaces waiting to satisfy demand from the entourage when they show up unexpectedly.   But even in China, that makes no sense.

It is China.   Maybe the parking lot attendants, unbeknownst to the management, are doing a little business on the side, taking some cars in before others, in exchange for a little hui lu- a bribe.   But again, there are no cars coming in any side entrance, or going around the other cars in line.   So that makes sense, but does not seem to be happening.

It is China.   The parking lot underground is really big, and on two levels, and the attendants are not using radios to communicate, so perhaps, in consideration of the customers, the attendants are making sure that there are spots available before letting the next car in.    Maybe there is a communication problem – the guys directing cars into spaces have to tell the next guy down the line that there is still another spot available, and that information gets passed to about six people, and takes about 3 to 10 minutes, before it gets to the guy who removes the “parking lot full” sign for the one next car.   It is China, and that could make sense, but even in China, the attendants would probably show enough initiative to count higher than one, and allow two cars in at a time.

Perhaps the vacant spaces are reserved for individuals, who own the space and would want to have it always available.  Perhaps.  But I don’t think ownership of parking spaces would work in a location such as this, and in any case, there were always scores of empty spaces.  Wouldn’t some enterprising parking lot manager make some deals?

Unlike my suggestions above, there could be simpler, even stupider explanations – air pollution regulations limit the number of engines running within the garage at any one time (sure);  the parking lot management is concerned about pedestrian safety (to exit or enter the garage, people on foot have to mix with the car traffic on the ramps, a no-no in the US) – (right – although it is certainly possible to receive such an explanation, given with a straight face);  the government of Hangzhou, in attempts to limit traffic, provides limits on parking garage access – this is actually sort of plausible, even if ridiculously stupid.   The heavy traffic jams within two blocks all around, due to cars lined up to get into the garage, would be eliminated with more “market friendly” access policies.

All the times my wife and I visited the hospital I parked in this lot, so I have some experience.  The 45 to 90 minute wait after 8:30 is no joke.  But parking is extremely tight everywhere.  One of the most ingenious ways of getting around the restricted supply of parking spaces was undertaken by a woman right in front of me in the line.  We were both sufficiently close to the entrance gate that no other car could pass us or take our space.  We were on the downward slope into the underground garage.  But the woman had no intention of parking in the garage.  She had an errand to run – perhaps ten minutes, or fifteen.  She waited in the line of cars until she was almost in the garage, then got out of her car, took the keys, and went and ran her errand.  Got back, nothing about the line had changed.  She got back in the car, did a u-turn in the combined entry-exit driveway, drove out, and was on her way.  Free parking.   I think this is what Bob Hariman, or James Scott, calls local knowledge.  Fabulous.  This is something about making the system work to your advantage.

About the parking lot – I confess to being at a loss.  I always say that there are many ways to solve any problem, but …. It is a mystery.   I would like to demonstrate the intricacies of the market, or of China, but I am stumped.    The point I want to make, though, is that in this market, such as it is, the supply makes the rules, and the demand can only choose to respond or go on driving around the block.    The rules don’t seem to be in the interests of the supply, either.  It is a puzzle.   A mystery.  This sort of thing should be undefined.     And it is at this point that Chinese themselves shrug their shoulders and utter the standard comment –  you know, it is China.  It’s fuza – complicated.   Say’s law is clearly wrong – there can be a general glut of parking spaces in this garage, even in the face of excess demand.  Somewhere, money must be involved.

Note 1- the line of cars waiting to get into the parking garage for the hospitals has plenty of precedents.  For many shopping malls – I am thinking of yintai near xihu (bastardized English as InTime), or the xichen square mall on wensan lu, or even MixMall in the new CBD, there can be a line of twenty or more cars waiting to get into the underground garage, on a normal evening at xichen, or weekend anytime at yintai or MixMall.   The parking lots can and do fill up, and the wait can be ten to twenty minutes even before the lot is full.

One has to question the design – it is not as if cars in modern China just appeared five years ago, and the shopping malls are very high standard in terms of store quality.  No one is walking in, or even taking a motorbike.   But there too, it is fuza – complicated. 

Libertarian Health Care

November, 2012 and updated 

Personal responsibility and preservation of power .. 

This was written just before and after the birth of our son, and was my take on the medical system.  I could not vouch personally for more than a few hospitals, perhaps six to eight, but stories from over the years, including doctors being murdered by enraged patients or family, confirms that my views expressed here are representative. 

What I saw every day –

Source: Gilles Sabrié, The New York Times at
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/01/chinas-health-care-crisis-lines-before-dawn-violence-and-no-trust.html

Just for fun, I looked online for stock photos of Chinese hospitals, doctors, and patients.  This site below has dozens of photos of what I never saw any day at any time.  Take a look, just for fun –

https://www.istockphoto.com/photos/china-hospital?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=china%20hospital

My article below is from 2012, but not inaccurate now for that.   The Systemic problem cannot be solved by Mr. Xi, regardless of how stringent the anti-corruption campaign becomes.  It is common for people to offer hongbao (red envelopes) as gifts to doctors, teachers, business associates, and government officials from whom one would appreciate a good result.  The anti-corruption campaign does not change that behavior, nor does it change the grinding down of people as they try to obtain medical services. The picture below is representative of the typical room in the pregnant women’s hospital.  Four or five women side by side in a room, before and after the birth.  The VIP room – a single room – might require a hongbao.

Bribery serves as life-support for Chinese hospitals.  Arku Jasmine.  Graphic Online, July 24, 2013.https://www.graphic.com.gh/international/international-news/bribery-serves-as-life-support-for-chinese-hospitals.html

Those who followed my reporting over a span of years noted that my attitude in China changed when Qing became pregnant.  As I read back, that seems right.  My concerns then became about more than head colds and what amazing stimulus was I going to experience next week.  I was in the day-to-day lived experience of 1.3 billion other people.  Oh – one more thing.  Now, in 2018, there is no evidence that Keynes is the author of the quote below.  So, I should say, attributed to Keynes by Samuelson. 

Calling All Libertarians!

A couple of years ago, I wrote about Brenna and I going to the hospital to check on a chest and throat cold, and I described how easy and efficient and inexpensive the experience was. Now, I find myself in the position of Keynes when challenged by a political rival for changing his views on some issue of current affairs, retorted, “When the conditions change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?”

I wrote a couple of weeks ago about the preservation of the System in hospital design.
The System design, for control and power, is preserved. And really, power conservation is not so unusual. But what I want to write about now is what accompanies power conservation, and that is the conservation of stupidity and laziness and acceptance of the status quo and “that’s not my job” attitude, even among people who are otherwise reasonably intelligent and have at least some modicum of training. And how the System allows for that. The System requires grinding people down.  The tools are mystery, lack of information, long lines to receive – not service, but a ticket to get service later.  Lack of information is the key.  When people do not have the ability to make sense of the System, whatever it is, they make up stories, including stories about leader power and efficacy of at-home remedies. And when people do get information from an official source, they have to choose – to rely on that message as Truth, or mistrust it as they have learned a thousand times before.  In the Chinese medical system, one confronts official mystery head-on.

In 2012, there began some noise about western hospitals looking to go to China – presumably in search of profits, not better health care for the world.  Even at that time, I thought – from my completely uninformed position in the American and Chinese medical markets and systems – that this was a poor plan.  To come in to a System, to have one entry point in a complex arrangement of sinews and choke points and flows of goods and patients and money – and expect to either reform the System or extract profit from it – this would seem an ultimate hubris.  Now, in 2018, I don’t see much change from 2012.  Perhaps there has been some due diligence going on.  The medical system is the government system in China.  There is a small private piece of the market, but it is of little consequence overall. In the vast majority of cases, it is the government hospital, government doctors, that Chinese will choose to trust.  After all – as has been the case in China for two thousand years – a private provider of a service has an incentive to cheat you.  In theory, the government provider should have no conflicted goals.

There are private market hospitals in the major cities including Hangzhou, particularly for pregnant women.  We looked at a couple of them.  They are close approximations to what I would expect from a pregnant women’s hospital in the US.  I was impressed.  Qing was more circumspect.  The hospitals are designed to serve 22-year old Chinese girls, who can pop babies out like candy.  Qing was almost twice as old, and the private hospitals were really not set up for medical complications, which old moms might have.  We chose the state-owned Hangzhou Pregnant Women’s Hospital, a couple of blocks from Xihu. This is a highly recommended hospital with the top rating of hospitals in China.  I used several connections to get us a VIP room at the hospital, which usually required not only guanxi but a reservation four or five months in advance.  Calls were made, and our reservation was confirmed.  Pretty much like the Hyatt, which was also just a couple of blocks away.  The story begins –

We are at D-Day minus 1. After class, we leave for the hospital, with suitcases and bags full of household goods. The plan is to stay for a week, since the delivery is to be by Caesarian.  Qing is pretty small, and she is not 19 years old, and natural birth might be tougher. The idea has been to do the birth by Caesarian since the beginning of seeing doctors, about 9 months ago.

We got to the hospital about 1:30 in the afternoon, Qing and her sister and I, and we went to the 8th floor of building 2 to see the doctor. This is the doctor Qing has seen for the last few months, and she is supposed to do the delivery tomorrow afternoon, after lunch. Say, about 2:00. This was just a quick hello, look-at-the-stomach visit, about ten minutes tops. Then, off to pay the money. Everything is paid in advance. Makes it easier for the hospital if you have complaints or a crisis, and want to take issue with the service. They already have – not only your money, but your bank account information. No credit cards – no intermediary to assist in a dispute, a la American Express.  Cash, or direct withdrawl. The hospital can presumably drain your bank account, if they want. Not sure they need the nicety of a signature on a receipt, and, as I tell my negotiation class, so you have a receipt.  If you don’t agree with the result, or have a problem, what to do, now?  In libertarian China, cash is king.  And people have to take personal responsibility for their health care, in ways that Americans could not imagine.

At about 3:00, we were in the room and registered. Not bad, considering all the prior SBB (stupid beyond belief) events of the previous months. This was the process.

Signing in took only about ten minutes, as well. Much faster when people have to take personal responsibility for their medical care. I mean, there was no worry about insurance. This is due to the manner in which health insurance works in China. Instead of the insurance company standing between you and the medical establishment, the insurer simply reimburses you for your prior expenses. You collect all the bills, invoices, statements you have accumulated over the last 9 months, and submit them as a package to the insurer.

The insurer then decides how much they want to pay, and after some time, they send you money. There does not seem to be any knowledge anywhere about what insurers will pay for and not pay for – certainly, no agent standing between you and the insurer. There does seem to be general knowledge that pregnancy is not considered an insurable event – I mean, personal responsibility again – if you are pregnant, that is your doing. You probably had a hand in the deal, or were at least in some way complicit, so this puts you in a moral hazard position. You could have not gotten pregnant, had you just been careful. How can we insure against such irresponsible behavior?

So the insurance company will pay for some things, and pay for some parts of pregnancy and childbirth at a lower rate. Apparently, you don’t know what they will cover or not, and there is no negotiation involved. As with many things in China, you simply take what you get. If you want to know why something did not get paid, you confront the System. Don’t forget the end-of-discussion put-off – ‘No why.”

The pay-in-advance health insurance system does have additional benefits for the insurance companies. Can you keep straight all the invoices and bills for medicine, and doctors, and tests, and hospital visits, for a major surgery? Think you might misplace one or two in the battlefield chaos that characterizes walking around the hospital in China? You are standing in line, to pay, to get a number, to see the doctor, to get a test, running from floor to floor without clear directions as to which office to go into, all the while keeping your medical records and receipts and schedules in a clear plastic pocket file.  You know, the kind of files that you might put receipts in, to add up at the end of the year to do income taxes. That is the preferred means of storing medical records here.  All this running around is done while pregnant, and fighting through the hordes of people all trying to do the same deciphering of the System.  God forbid you should have to go to the bathroom somewhere in the process, and lose your place in line.  You are constantly taking pieces of paper out of the pocket file, putting paper in, showing to this clerk or nurse or that one, making sure the paper is stamped, and stamped properly.  Think you might misplace a receipt?

If you do need a duplicate bill for some piece of the service, are you really going to go stand in line for another couple of hours at the hospital to do that? Take a day off from work to run through the labyrinth? Maybe better to just eat some bitterness, as is the age-old phrase in China.

The insurance companies make out ok in another respect. The sheer volume of crowds, and the delay, and the personal care 
of medical records (with attendant possibility of loss, or false recording, or missing information) mean that many illnesses that are covered by insurance probably do not get treated, or they get treated to a very low level of quality. The government claims that 95% of Chinese have health insurance.  That is no doubt true, as true as any statement in extremity can be.

Cost savings from lost records, geographic isolation, and extremely limited coverage are passed on to the government and the insurance companies.  And really, what good is an insurance system that can’t make money?  In China, we should always be thinking of the greater good – that of the System.  George Orwell understood very well.

Take heart attacks, or cancer. No doubt whatsoever that
 the crowds and delay and general incompetence – not to mention lack of availability and coverage –  kill a lot of
 people before they would die in some other parts of the world.  We have a new hospital not ten minutes driving from our apartment.  But in the difficult world of traffic and non-yielding of drivers to emergency vehicles, that ten minute trip could easily expand to an hour or more.
  And don’t forget that the largest businesses in China, including
 the health insurance companies, are state owned. So the
 government and the companies have some common interests -
they have moral hazard problems, as we say in micro class. 
The State designs the health care system. The insurance
 companies live in it. But both have an interest in keeping medical care costs down. I am not trying to be too flip about this – a little, but not too much – the organizational
 design reminds me of the joke about hitting a pedestrian
 with your car – better to kill him, than injure him. Back up and roll over him again, if you need to. The State designs 
the system for delay, and inattention, and grinding, from building design to scheduling of visits to provision of care to reimbursement for expenses. The State 
helps the insurance companies by keeping too many people 
from getting care that is too good. Good care would mean more costs for the insurance companies. Lower profits mean lower GDP growth.  It is really the case that some Chinese just choose not to go to the hospital rather than enter the System.

In the US, we have had the discussions about providing health care for most Americans. The concept is that providing decent preventive care, and decent routine care, will prevent much more costly emergency care when there is a crisis. But this is different systemic thinking than in China.  The health care system does not work well for many people in either place; but I venture to say that the system works better for the majority of people in the US, even at ruinous costs in premiums, than it does in China, where premium costs are less but service and availability and coverage and information are much less.

Keep in mind that we are living in the capital of one of the three or four wealthiest provinces in China. We are in the Zhejiang Province Pregnant Women’s Hospital, the hospital generally acknowledged here as the best place to be.

So other hospitals, in other places, are not as good, even in Hangzhou. And there are other cities in Zhejiang Province. And there are other cities in China. And there is the rural countryside, where some medical care is now provided but sort of at a “first-aid” level of service. There is a lot of faith in folklore and tales and medicinal herbs and Chinese culture, though. Easier, faster, less expensive, and for many things, just might work.

In the US, the insurance companies want the government to provide coverage, or demand that people buy it. The companies will make out like bandits – more customers, more profits. But in China, my guess is that there is no such 
push from insurance companies to provide more health coverage for rural people, or to improve the level of care for urban people. More coverage for rural people just means that the government has to pay more to the insurance companies for the care. A higher level of care would mean that some people would live longer, and require more services. And improving the quality of care would just cost more money. Where is the benefit? How does providing more care improve GDP?

You begin to understand how big companies in China can be
 so profitable. I mean, there are plenty of other reasons -
sweetheart contracts, and soft budget constraints on state-owned companies, and cooking the books, if needed. But
 costs of providing services, whatever the business, are low – 
labor costs are typically 70% or so of business costs, even in the US.  In China, land costs are a much greater portion of overall costs than in the US – either acquisition costs or rental costs.  And labor is cheap in China, even with rising salaries and some overstaffed organizations. And, in general, the level of service provided, in relation to the costs, is poor.  For many things, the costs to the customer in China are higher than in the US – cars, apartments, clothes, electronics, household appliances, furniture. There is a large 
enough middle class to pay for the extra costs. But there is a huge part of the population that is left out of the market, and no short term way to bring them into the market. And, even 
if a couple of hundred million more people can be brought into
 the system, the quality of what is purchased is often quite poor.
 You remember me bringing suitcases full of cosmetics, vitamins, baby formula, and electronics to China on my trips back from Chicago.
 All the same goods are available in China, same packaging, quite possibly made in China, but people in China trust what is made in
 the US, or at least imported into the US from China and then sent back to China, more than the same stuff made in China and distributed in China.
 The lack of enforcement of quality controls, inability to control the supply chain, lack of enforcement of intellectual property laws, and the lax treatment of copying, means that people in China have no
 confidence that the Louis Vuitton bag in the LV store in China is really an LV bag – or that the drugs purchased in the Watson’s, or the hospital pharmacy, are real.  And they have no confidence that the 
Elizabeth Arden face cream, or the Robitussen cough medicine,
 same box as in the US, same labels, is not made in some
 garage using waste products for raw materials. So, the same model Mercedes Benz car that is made in Germany costs much more than the Mercedes Benz car made in China, and the difference is not only in import fees and shipping.

So, suffice it to say that the level of service in the hospital reflects the design of the culture. The System is designed for mystery and conservation of power.  The System is designed not to provide information, and not to make personal decision-making easy. When people cannot get the information they need to make decisions, they resort to whatever might seem to give them a hint as to quality – rumor, online evaluations (even if those, too, are fake), smell, trust obtained through personal guanxi.  The result is a herd instinct – quality detected in one arena leads to great market demand, and distortion of prices.  There is a saying about quality in China – “People don’t know.  Money knows.” Meaning that price is a strong indicator of quality.  That might be more true in China than in the US, with its regulation and inspections and ability to sue and free media.

The room in the hospital is actually sort of ok. We are paying an extra 40,000 yuan for one of the VIP rooms on one of the upper floors.  The VIP rooms separate the officers, as it were, from the enlisted men. The lower floors have the enlisted women’s delivery and recovery rooms. Four or five women to a room, beds lined up like in an episode of MASH, although with the beds closer together and probably not quite as sanitary as the MASH units actually were.

We have one of the officer’s quarters rooms. Bright, lots of recessed lights, flat screen tv, microwave. As befits the Chinese interpretation of hospital room as hotel room, there is a mini-fridge, a bathroom with one of those Japanese electronic toilets that do all those things that we don’t really know about, and you are afraid to push any buttons because you don’t know what might squirt you and with what and where. And lots and lots of closet space. More than in our apartment. Shelves, places to store boxes, like people are moving in for a week. Which, actually, I guess, they are. There is a couch that folds into a bed, for the spouse or relative to sleep on. There is one not so nice chair, and a small dresser. The afternoon light is good, and we are high up enough to get only background traffic noise, which to me is ok – some awareness of what is going on outside, while our own intense attention and activity is focused inside.

It turns out that we needed the closet and shelf space.  I did not understand why we left our apartment in Hangzhou with so much … stuff – towels and bed linens and plastic bowls.  Turns out that we have rented a hotel room, although a fairly low class hotel at that.  Customers bring their own bed linens, towels, bowels for washing and cleaning.  The hospital provides very nearly nothing except a bed with one set of sheets and blankets.

It is now 4:15 in the afternoon. Qing is off doing other tests, ultrasound, blood tests. When she returned, I thought that we could order food from the hospital for lunch, or dinner.  Wrong again.  Our hotel room is not American plan. If you want food, you can buy it from the hospital restaurant (in the VIP rooms, you order from a menu. In the enlisted men’s – or women’s – rooms, your choice is the shitang, the dining hall, with military grade dining).  In the majority of cases, the patient’s family brings food in from outside and mix and heat up ingredients in the room.  It is up to the family to make sure the patient gets a proper diet, even after an operation –  again, taking personal responsibility for health care.  And again, this is the VIP room.

Events for tomorrow are shaping up as follows – morning, nothing. Watch tv. After lunch, about 1:30, the main events begin. Operation will take about 90 minutes, including recovery time, and they don’t give Qing any relaxant, or pill to get her a bit groggy, much before the operation. At this point, I am expecting to have some details to report by about 3:00 our time.

Signing off for now. More when events warrant.

Update. At 2:00 AM, Qing’s water broke. She called the nurse, using the call button. Nurse comes, surveys the situation. Does nothing. For those of you who have not yet figured this out, China can be a libertarian’s wet dream. It is personal responsibility all the way. As I mentioned before, the hospital room is really more like renting a hotel room. There is a bed, and some closets. But no towels, cups, glasses. One bottle of nearly empty hand soap. As with a hotel room, there is a shower with small bottles of liquid soap, shampoo, some 
other kind of lotion. But no washcloths or towels. There is one box of tissues, and a reasonably full container of toilet
paper, but those items are not replenished when empty. Bring your own. What was in the room when we walked in was left over by the previous tenant – and not taken away by the cleaning staff.  Personal responsibility dictates that you bring your own towels, washcloths, tissues, toilet paper. The hospital provides a room, and a once-a-day change of sheets.  If the sheets get soiled, or wet – as in, a pregnant woman’s water breaking – well, too bad. You should have thought of that when you moved in. Wait until tomorrow to change the sheets.

So, back to water breaking –

There are people here who walk around with white uniforms, and are called “nurses,” but I doubt their competence. They refuse to answer any but the simplest questions, and they refuse to do any work. So the “nurse” who comes in to survey the damage from the water breaking does so, I think, only so she can file a report saying that the water broke. All the clean up, all the replacement of sheets, is done by anyone else in the room other than the people who are paid to work at the hospital. Same thing for assistance in bed pan use. In the hospital in China, you make provisions for your own bed pan changes. Personal responsibility. When the water breaks, the only reaction of the nursing and doctor staff is to ask us – us – whether we want to wait for the regular doctor, at about 2:00 PM as originally scheduled, do the operation now, at 2:00 AM, or try to do natural child birth.

The question is presented as you would ask someone if you want fries with that, and the answer is expected to be about as thoughtful. No questions allowed, other than the most simplistic. No information on what others do, no consideration of age or particular situation, no consideration of progress in having contractions. Personal responsibility. You decide about your medical care. When you decide, the hospital will deliver the goods, as it were. But you cannot ask about consequences, you cannot get information on common practice, you cannot ask what someone with – you know, some medical training – would do in a similar circumstance. For us, the demand for a decision is a false choice, since there is no harm in waiting at least until the morning, and that is what I suggest to Qing. She agrees. So we wait.

There are bed mats, of a sort, that one can put under a person who is draining anything, to absorb the liquids and sort of prevent the patient from having to lie in his or her own excretions. You can buy them in the stores in the US, for use at home. You change them as needed.

The retail market for such mats is big in China, because people have to bring their own to the hospital. And, you know, if you bring it, you should install it. So the nursing staff will not change the mats. You can throw the used ones in the corner, and maybe tomorrow someone will come by to pick it up. This is the VIP level of service in one of the most sophisticated hospitals in Zhejiang Province. God help you if have only one person to assist you in the hospital. You need two people to lift up the patient and remove the used mat and put the clean one underneath.

Which brings up a larger question – what happens to the person who does not have two or three or four family members who do not have to work, who can take days off at a time to provide round the clock care to a relative in the hospital?  You can rent assistance – farm women are available outside the hospital to come in and be surrogate family for a few hours or a few days.  You can imagine their level of care in changing sheets, bedpans, and cleaning up.  My guess is that people who need to rent such help have a high rate of infections or other complications. But no need to worry about the hospital – personal responsibility. No worry about malpractice lawsuits.

The suggestion of trying natural child birth is an interesting proposal. In the prior 9 months, no one thought that natural child birth would be a good idea for Qing, given her physical size and age. Now, you know, neither the doctors nor the nurses nor the hospital generally have any information about Qing whatsoever. Patients provide their own medical history and “chart” information. The hospital has approximately the information that a hotel would have about its customers.  So I suppose one could forgive a 14 year-old candy striper volunteer for making the natural child birth suggestion to Qing and me. But that is not supposed to be the sort of person we are dealing with. We are supposed to be talking to a “nurse” – one with surgical or at least obstetric experience – we are on the VIP floor of the Pregnant Women’s Hospital. So the only justification I can see for offering the natural child birth option is that the hospital would make more money. Now it is true, with natural child birth, the delivery cost is less, and a woman only stays in the hospital for 3 days instead of 7.  But as is often the case, I think, Chinese are playing a different game than we would play in the US. A personal responsibility game. If you begin the natural child birth, and then have to switch to the Caesarian due to complications, then the hospital charges you for both procedures. I knew that. Trusting soul that I am, I asked that question a few days before, when we did the tour of the VIP floor. Beat them at their own game, that time, I did. So the suggestion to try natural child birth is actually to request an upgrade in service, albeit one that might end up costing us double. But, you say, what about the difference in the money received for 3 days hotel room rental instead of 7 days? Doesn’t that still provide a loss for the hospital, if you opt for the natural over Caesarian? Not necessarily. You have to consider turnover. If the hospital can process two births in the time once reserved for one, the increase in payments to the hospital is not so marginal. So – the hospital proposal is, try the natural child birth, which, if you find you cannot do it, we charge you for two births; and if you do the natural child birth, and it works, we can squeeze another customer into the schedule, with another birth and the attendant extra costs.

There are other complications. Our doctor, who works every day at the hospital, and only sees patients with a fair amount of guanxi, and probably sends most of her customers to the VIP floors, does not seem to have the same status on the VIP floors as the doctors assigned to the VIP floors.  Perhaps this is because our regular doctor gets different kickbacks than the full time doctors on staff – I really don’t know, but that is a fair guess. The regular doctors assigned to the VIP floor get an end of the year bonus if they take business away from the other doctors, or something. Only speculation on my part, but I am confident that such a system could be possible. So the nurses on the floor are sort of pushing us in the direction of not waiting for our “regular” doctor to do the operation. The nurses probably get a cut of the doctor’s bonus.

Qing wanted to wait, but the contractions started coming pretty often, and by 7:00 AM, we are down to four minutes, lasting about two minutes.
We decide to do the operation now. The hospital staff concurred with our excellent decision – get Qing in and out early, and perhaps the processing of regularly scheduled Caesarian births could still be maintained.  A woman comes by with a bed, to transfer Qing to the operating room. The woman does nothing. We (Qing’s sisters and I) transfer Qing to the bed. The hospital woman stands there. We put the railings up on the sides of the bed, and we wheel the bed down the hall. The woman does provide directions, though. I have to give her credit for that. Real personal responsibility would have demanded that we stop and ask for directions to the operating room, a couple of floors away.

Contempt is the word that comes to mind – my feelings about the hospital and staff. I know they are subject as well to the System grinding down process, but I cannot feel sympathy for their situation, since I detect none in them for us. I asked, or Qing asked, a “nurse” about the frequency of contractions, and strength, and duration. All are indicative of progress in birth process. I know that to ask such questions is high impertinence, but that is just who I am. The “nurse” was able to tell us that contractions five minutes apart were closer than contractions that were 10 minutes apart. She did volunteer, though, that stronger contractions were more significant than milder ones. She must have taken the extra credit classes in nursing school.

When we get to the operating room, all is ready – if they can start by 7:15, they can finish by 9:00 when the regularly scheduled customers start to arrive. Maintain the schedule. The doctors give Qing a sedative and anesthetic.  They start to cut on her stomach before the anesthetic fully kicks in, but that is ok.  The doctors remain on schedule.

Ben is born about 8:45 AM, November 2, 2012.  He is fine, and Qing is as fine as she can be, given what she has gone through.  Done by 9:00.  Phew.  Got in and out just in time.

At one point, about 1:30 in the afternoon of November 2, when Qing and the baby are trying to sleep after a trying morning, three different “nurses” came into the room in a span of about 25 minutes. This is what they did – one turned on the lights and woke everyone to check Qing’s blood pressure – which is already being constantly monitored on a screen, and certainly does not require turning on any lights; second one comes in to wake up Qing to take her temperature, which really doesn’t require waking her; third one comes in to take the baby’s temperature, waking him up in the process. My guess is that in the US, the over-regulated, too-expensive US, one nurse would be able to handle all three of those difficult tasks. She might come in just as you and the baby were trying to sleep, and turn on the light, but it would only happen once. By the way, this sort of invasion happened again, later in the afternoon, when again all of us were trying to get some sleep.

At about 4:00 in the afternoon, the “nurse” who is supposed to show us all how to put the baby on the nipple, found that the baby had pooped, and the diaper needed to be changed.  I have already told you that “nurses” here do virtually nothing – they do not change out catheter bags, for instance – again, more taking personal responsibility for health care – but this “nurse” proceeded, probably against the training of the last 60 years of Chinese culture, to change the baby’s diaper for us, wiping off the poop from his butt.  She did, however, expect to stop after two cursory wipes, when poop was still stuck everywhere on the kid’s bottom. I had to go from spot to spot, pointing out, three times, where this (deleted) “nurse” had yet to actually clean the kid off. If the kid got diaper rash, no doubt they would blame the ignorant foreigner parent.

Not changing out catheter bags, by the way, means that the family has to bring several plastic bowls, pretty big, to the hospital.  So that is what the plastic bowls are for – to catch drainage or leakage in process.  At least one to empty out things like catheter bags, or maybe store the soiled bed mats until someone can come by and take them away. My plan is to just dump all the waste outside the door, and let someone else clean it up. I think my years in China have taught me how to be more Chinese.

Pain management does get a high level of attention in the Chinese hospital. The key goal is to keep costs down, so patients are expected to just sort of grin and bear it. It is now Saturday morning, about 24 hours after the birth. Qing has been in some pain since yesterday afternoon, at the site of insertion of some drip. She has asked for something for the pain, but the “nurse” came in, talked to her for a moment, and assured Qing that everything was ok.  She was offered some sort of temporary relief via a shot – but, personal responsibility again, we were warned that the shot would cost extra. For most people, pain should just be overcome, like a good communist soldier. For the cause.

And that is the end of it. Qing sent me home for some sleep last night. No doubt that I needed it, but I think she also sent me home to keep me from physically harming a “nurse” who tells me that pain is ok. Grin and bear it.

The thing that knocks me out is that the population goes along with this lunacy. If the “nurse” says it is ok, well, then. It is her experience that triumphs the pain of the individual. The patient is just supposed to be more stoic, more Buddhist, more Daoist, I dunno, offer it up to Jesus, or something. Grinding.

I am convinced at this point that it would have been less expensive, and more efficient, and with higher level of care, if we had just rented a regular hotel room in a hotel, and then hired a doctor and some real nurses to take care of Qing and the baby for a week. I would be willing to fly them over. There are reports of good expat hospitals in Beijing and Shanghai. But so far, not in the capital of one of the three or four richest provinces in China. After all, China is still a developing country. And for all those libertarians in the US, maybe progress in medical care in China has gone about as fur as it can go.  Like the World’s Fair in St. Louis in 1904.  With regard to personal responsibility, it is about the best of all possible worlds.  “Progress” would almost certainly mean the hospital taking on more risk.

Some liberal bleeding heart reading this in the US might want to stick up for the underdog hospital and medical system in this story. After all, it is a different culture. It is China. Chinese women’s bodies are different from those of women in America, I am told.  I don’t understand the culture. I don’t understand the wisdom of the System.  5000 years of Chinese culture. After all, 1.3 billion people got born here in the last 80 or so years.  All their moms got through the process. Why should I impose my western standards on China?

This is the point at which the cultural relativists, already in agreement with libertarians on a lot of issues, have a problem with medical science and basic personal choice. Many women in China who have the means opt to go to Hong Kong, with western medical standards, to give birth. Screw 5000 years of culture. When I am in pain, give me medicine. When my baby needs care, give it to
 her. Don’t tell me that pain or infection or inattention is God’s will, or Fate.  I am choosing not to believe Todd Aiken, the Republican congressman from Tennessee who claimed that in the case of “legitimate” rape, women’s bodies “just have a way to shut that whole thing down.”  In the cases of “legitimate” pregnancy, I don’t think women should just suck it up and bear the pain. Political scientists talk about two choices for people in a society – voice, and exit.  Express your desires, work for change, or leave. The first choice, voice, is not doing Chinese women any good just yet. So, if they can get out for pregnancy and delivery, they get out or they finagle their way to more guanxi than I have.

I have been referring to the hospital here as a dongwu yi yuan – an animal hospital. But that is really unfair, to the animal hospitals in the US. Yes, it is true that people get treated like animals, and their personal care and time mean nothing to the System. Only the processing of people matters. There are pretensions to the contrary. The floor on the VIP floor is pretty clean. The lights in the hallway are bright. There are some plants, and I can look down the hall and see a “nurse” walking, but no horde of humanity pushing to cheat their way in line or get theirs before someone else does. But as with many things in China, the cleanliness and newness are form over substance.  As in the Wizard of Oz, best to not look behind the curtain.

Enough for now.  Written on my hospital breaks, when the niece and sisters are taking charge of changing catheter bags, and washing the towels that we brought to wipe off Qing and the baby, changing diapers, and bed mats. They really are much better at all this than I am. After all, it is China. They have much more of a sense of personal responsibility.

Note to Foreign Students, late 2014

Zhejiang University of Science and  Technology          Hangzhou 

Before you came to China, you were aware of censorship by the Chinese government.   You likely knew that Youtube,  Twitter,  Facebook, and some blog site hosts – blogspot, among others – were blocked by the Chinese government.    You understand that the CCP is so desperately afraid of the Chinese people that it cannot tolerate information from the outside – or inside – that is too “dangerous” to Party longevity.

In 2012, both the New York Times and any news sites operated by Bloomberg were blocked by the Chinese government, in retaliation for reporting on the fabulous family wealth of wen jiabao and xi jinping.    All of their sites are still blocked, including economic information and opinion from Paul Krugman, the Nobel prize winning economist.

In the last three months, we have entered a new phase of blocking unlike anything in the past ten years.    Google was intermittently blocked over the last two years, for their refusal to submit to censorship.   But that blocking applied only to the use of the search engine.

Now, gmail accounts are generally blocked – not always, and not all, but enough to make reliable communication impossible.   I have heard that other American email servers – Hotmail and  Yahoo – are at least occasionally blocked.   My AOL – America Online – service is not blocked, but extremely slow – can take hours for an email to go through.   The meaning of this is that, again, reliable communication is not possible.  You never know when your email is going to go through, and you don’t know if you are being sent emails that you do not get.   I can not have confidence that my students are getting emails I send with readings, ppt, and notes.

For teaching purposes, the blocking of web sites and servers is a bigger problem.    I need access to academic and professional articles, for both my own research and to give to you.  

Quite a few of my attempts to get articles in the last month have been blocked or are so slow –taking hours to load – that the effect is to stifle research.   

I have a workaround from a Chinese student, that seems to get Google access through Hong Kong, but this is also slow and not very reliable, and still fails to get access to many academic articles or sites.

It is now difficult for me to teach here.   I spend hours trying to send emails or get information, and that is just not acceptable.

The crackdown on communication is part of a current government strategy to accomplish several things – replace western communications suppliers – Apple, for example – with Chinese products (see, for example, Replace foreign products with Chinese)

and assist Chinese internet companies – Alibaba, Huawei, others – to become dominant providers inside and outside China, as well as protect the Chinese people from the deadly ideas coming from the west (America) that are designed to destroy China and the Party.   No joke.  These are ideas like freedom of speech, civil rights, and freedom of the press  (see “Document No. 9,”  Communist Party Central Office, spring 2013, if you can get it – Document No. 9 translation).

 I want you to understand that the blocking, like that of gmail, does not need to be perfect to do its job.   What is desired, more than the censorship itself, is to create a climate of uncertainty that encourages people to not bother looking, or to waste just enough time that they fail to accomplish what was intended.   Students give up trying to communicate.  Teachers give up trying to teach.   Researchers give up trying to understand.   Then, the Party is the only voice.

There have been temporary crackdowns on communications in the past.   You may expect very severe crackdowns in the month before June 4,  2015, as the Party tries to erase discussion of the June 4, 1989 murder of students by the army in Tian’anmen Square.

But this current crackdown is different.   This is not temporary.  It will last for several years, in my opinion, and will probably get worse.    You can get a Chinese email address to help communications, but you cannot get better access to web sites for information.   If you buy a VPN – virtual private network – then your access might be pretty good for some time, but the government has gotten pretty good at shutting those down as well, and you don’t know when your VPN will suddenly fail to work.

There is no reason to think that access will become easier in the next few years.   The government and Party have made it clear that internet access will be controlled more, and openness is not part of the strategy.    One can think of this as a policy of  “China for Chinese.   Foreigners go home.”

That is what I am suggesting that you consider, and advise friends back home who might be thinking of coming here next year and after.    China is a wonderfully interesting place, with lots to teach you.   But you need to consider the stupidity of the blocking in the calculation of whether you should study or work in China.

In the meantime, while you are here, I strongly urge you to not get angry about the blocking.    Authoritarian regimes understand anger and hate, and are not worried about that.

What authoritarian regimes everywhere do not understand, and cannot tolerate, is laughter.   I strongly urge you to laugh, loudly, consistently, and often, at the stupidity of a government so afraid of its own people that it cannot afford to let them see Youtube.

William D.  Markle, Professor

Some resources, if you can get them –

Document 9: A ChinaFile Translation.  China File.  http://www.chinafile.com/document-9-chinafile-translation

Perry Link. Censoring the News Before It Happens. China File.  July 10, 2013   http://www.chinafile.com/censoring-news-it-happens

Zeng Jinyan.  This Family Nightmare Is The Price Of Political Expression In China – “Daddy’s ‘Friends’ Are Actually Plainclothes Cops” ChinaFile, September 23, 2014.  http://www.chinafile.com/reporting-opinion/viewpoint/daddys-friends-are-actually-plainclothes-cops

Hospital Rules

Summer and Fall, 2012 

(reader note – this is a bit long, but has some details about hospital care.  Forewarned is forearmed)

A while ago, I wrote about mysteries of the parking lot market in Hangzhou. 

There are procedural mysteries everywhere in China.    Systems that are clearly not care-full of the needs of customers, but at the same time, seem not to be in the interests of the provider.   Hospital operations are another good example.   Take the Zhejiang Pregnant Women’s Hospital, one of the AAA rated hospitals in China.   Or the Hangzhou No. 1 Hospital, across the street from the Pregnant Women’s Hospital, another AAA facility.   Or, I surmise, most any hospital in China.   The systems, both physical and procedural, seem chaotic, redundant, and stupid, for every human inside the building.

It is supposed to be a sophisticated management insight that systems try to optimize.   Something.   Maybe not customer satisfaction, but maybe management benefits, or leader salaries, or bureaucratic time.   Profits.  Maybe it is hard to see what is being maximized or minimized, but by default, something must be. 

Hospital Rules has two meanings here – the procedures and requirements that any organization must impose to maintain order; and the peculiar implementation of rules in hospitals in China for which the only discernible purpose is to grind the customers into submission.   The administrative system – the Rules – uber alles. 

Source: my Experience at a Chinese Hospital  http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2014-04/23/content_17455961_2.htm

So we think that hospitals, like any other institution, anywhere, are maximizing someone’s comfort, someone’s benefit.   Could be doctors – we think that, in the US.  Could be hospital administrators.  Or insurance companies.  Or the government.   No one thinks the system maximizes patient care.   Certainly, no one in China thinks that.   Maybe benefits accrue to no one physically at the hospital – maybe it is the government officials in charge of setting standards for hospital procedures, or  those benefitting from contractor or developer kickbacks, who are many years gone from observing the actual operation of a hospital, but nevertheless profited from designing hospital systems.

That could be.  Architects are notorious for maximizing their own interests, to the detriment of the customer or the operator.   The system in China could be maximizing the interests of some group of original hospital designers.   Flow charts and department layouts and coordination with other hospital departments.    Flow of paperwork, flow of people, flow of medicines and blood vials and cleaning supplies and band-aids.   It is no accident that hospitals are laid out as they are.   

In China, the physical design admirably reflects the lack of concern for normal procedures.  It is as if all these people showing up every day – who could’ve known?   It is not as if the hospital layout was designed in the 1920s, and modern medicine needs different size rooms and storage areas for equipment, and wall space for oxygen and air and ten other fluids, and the poor old buildings are just trying to cope.     I mean, the floor layout, and the room sizes, are entirely appropriate to the battlefield conditions one finds in the hospitals at any time of day.   In other words, the battlefield conditions are built in.  The Pregnant Women’s Hospital is really a Chinese MASH unit – maternity and standing hospital.  God forbid that pregnant women would want to sit down.

You can probably guess by this point. I do not suggest that hospital procedures are designed to maximize patient comfort or satisfaction.     But let me give you some details.   The hospital system, like many systems in China, is designed for grinding.   Grinding people, to the point at which they give up protest, or resistance, or care about quality, and settle for … whatever the system provides.     Animals will protest when you beat them, but if you beat them enough, they will work for you.    Power maintains its privileges through mystery and struggle.   Power, in the hospital system, may not be maximized, but it is conserved.  The system uses just enough mystery, just enough struggle, to retain its privileges and force the patients, and their spouses and assistants, to submit.

The Pregnant Womens’ Hospital in Hangzhou has multiple entrances.    In a place with hundreds of people going in and out at any one time, this probably makes good sense, not to funnel everyone through one set of doors.    But the physical hospital layout exhibits one of the Chinese characteristics in building that I just cannot get over, unless one considers the role of mystery in Chinese culture.

This is the penchant, everywhere, for making building exteriors indistinct and their interiors confusing.    We all like buildings that are not foursquare boxes;  but we also appreciate when a building tells us something about where to go, or how to get there, whether with signs or design.   Chinese hospitals do neither.    Mystery is a key design principal – the less you know about how a building works, the more power the building management has over you.    Not that the management really needs to exercise power over patients;  patients are already at something of a disadvantage by walking into the hospital.   But mystery, whether in design, or communication, supports power. 

At the Pregnant Women’s Hospital there are three main hospital buildings, all built at one time.   It is a hospital, so you don’t expect every floor to have the same layout, but you sort of expect some connectedness in going from building to building, especially at the first floor.

But you can’t walk from building 1 to building 2, or building 3, by any means other than by walking through an alley, crowded with moving trucks and cars and people, and then by narrow hallways full of old computers and hospital equipment lying around the corridor.   Sort of like the garbage dump inside the spacecraft in Star Wars, into which Luke and the Princess and Han get dumped, and the walls start closing in on them.  No scary underwater creatures, though.   We are not really in a movie.   Too bad.   That would make more sense.

And it is not in the design, people were not expected to walk between buildings.   They must walk between buildings to get different pieces of their own health care.      But the unclear physical layout is the beginning of the mysterious Chinese process of grinding down, by means of design.    Some more examples –

There are generally no clinics, or individual doctor offices in China.  When someone has a cold, they go to the hospital.    And even in the Pregnant Women’s hospital, with multiple entrances, everyone has to pay first, before service.   I have used hospital emergency rooms two times, and even then someone has to pay for you before you get served.    If you are dying, or bleeding profusely, or in extreme pain, make sure you have at least two people to go with you to the hospital – one to drive the car, and wait in line to park while you go inside, and one more person to stand in line to pay for you.   Bring some money, as well.   Not a lot, maybe a few yuan, but fee for service is the operating principal much of the time.   If you need help getting upstairs to see the doctor, bring another person.    (Actually, fixing these inappropriate procedures would cut down significantly on the crowded conditions – no one looking for emergency treatment would dare come to the hospital alone).

Now, about paying for service – this can get complicated.  Sometimes, you can stand in line to pay, tell the cashier what is wrong with you, and they will charge the appropriate amount and give you a receipt to get served by the doctor somewhere else in the hospital.   Ok.   But most of the time, it seems, you must have a signed note, sort of like an appointment, but not really, from the doctor before you can pay.   So – you have to go see the doctor, stand in line at the doctor’s office, to “get a number,”  as they say here, so you can pay before you go see the doctor.   I am not kidding.  This is not true for emergency procedures, but it is certainly true for most any normal procedure, including monthly trips to the gynecologist, in the Hangzhou hospitals. 

Payment is always on the first floor, generally at least one floor and half a hospital away from the office where you had to get a number from the doctor.   The patient, whatever condition they are in, if they can walk, they should physically carry the piece of paper with the number to the business office, where the payment can be made and the receipt will serve as admission to the presence of the doctor.

If you have sufficient guanxi, you can see the same doctor every scheduled pregnancy visit, every month or two weeks.   But don’t get the impression that you call, get an appointment, show up ten minutes before the appointment, wait a little long, but get in within half an hour to spend a few minutes with your personal doctor, who knows your history and has your records and will more or less patiently listen to questions and provide answers.     That would be a mistake.

First of all, no one in the hospital – not a doctor, not a nurse, not a technician, not an administrator – is reachable by cell phone, land line phone, email, text, twitter, or a sense of general human compassion.    Phone numbers don’t exist or if they do, calls go unanswered.    It is not possible to make an appointment for any service, whatsoever.   When you want service, come to the hospital, and get in line.   Face-to-face is the only form of contact.   I would guess there is no patient advocate in Chinese hospitals.

Doctors are in short supply, and doctors don’t get to choose their patients, in any real sense.   They have some control over how many patients they can take on, but the nature of guanxi means that a friend of a friend can always sort of impose on a doctor to take one more patient, and for the doctor to say no would mean loss of face for the person making the request, which one tries to avoid.   So, doctors end up with far more patients than any medical standards off the battlefield would allow.   But every patient is in the doctor’s office because of guanxi from somewhere.

The doctor gets into the office at about 8:30.   Women who have previously seen that doctor, and are in some minor sense, her patients –  have been lined up outside the office since about 6:30 or 7:00, waiting to get into the office to “get a number.” 

When the assistant open the door, you can imagine the rush.   It would be comedy, if everyone weren’t so serious.  It would be sad, if this were a Civil War battlefield hospital, with men begging for care.    Here, it is just outrageous and stupid.   When the door opens, the twenty or thirty women waiting rush the door, and ten or fifteen make it inside the door.   The losers wait outside the doctor’s office door, until someone walk out.  The doctor is seated at a small desk, and the pregnant women, in various stages, are thrusting  their medical records from three sides of the desk at the doctor.   When the doctor take the medical records, the patient gets a number, which sets her place in line to – come back and see the doctor.   Not a joke.    When the doctor gives you a piece of paper with a number on it, you are IN.    By this point, the winners feel pretty special.    But that is how the grinding process works.

The wait begins.   No one is going to see the doctor for half an hour or an hour, because the doctor is sitting at the desk handing out numbers, being on the phone, looking up information on the computer, answering urgently shouted requests from the horde.

 Our particular doctor only has office hours one-half day a week, in the morning.   If you can’t get a number for that day, you can come back next week or do something else, unspecified.    But the something else does not include seeing a doctor in the next office.   You did not develop the guanxi to see that guy.

For some people though, not getting a number from the doctor is no impediment to seeing the doctor.   In our case, yesterday, the doctor gave out 28 numbers to see 28 patients between about 9:00 AM and about 12:30, when she would leave.    The   hospital itself gives out the first few numbers to see the doctor, presumably for the people who get to the hospital at 6:00 AM and before the doctor herself gets there.   The number of numbers given out by the hospital varies, but sometimes the hospital gives out numbers 1 to 10.   The doctor herself, on our last visit, gave out numbers from 16 to 33, for a total of 10 plus 18, or 28 patients.  

But some women walked in with numbers, and their names in the computer, for numbers 11 through 15, that the doctor did not give out.    She was a little pissed about the imposition, but this is extra special guanxi at work.   Not only do these five women have a number that the doctor did not give out, their names are already in the computer for the doctor to see.   She could refuse to see these patients, but even doctors have issues of guanxi to deal with, for promotions and more money and other mundane work benefits.   So, 33 patients in about 3 and one-half hours, or about 10 per hour.    Pregnant women who, in a normal world, should have questions, and fairly intricate questions at that, requiring thoughtful answers.   Not to mention saying hello, and goodbye, and measuring the circumference of the stomach, and looking at records of blood tests and ultrasounds and other tests that might have been done in the time since the previous visit.   And, constructing a story that makes sense about the medical history of the patient, to provide more tailored advice.    For the sake of patient care, one hopes that the doctor never has to go to the bathroom, or have an emergency.   In that case, everyone would just have to come back next week.

Actually, it is good that you have to wait.  While waiting, you can go pay for the visit, because you can’t come back and see the doctor without the paid receipt.   Or you can go weigh yourself, get blood pressure taken, or get a blood test.   Or a nap.    Befitting the battlefield conditions, there are people sleeping everywhere, propped up against walls and chairs, women sprawled sideways on chairs trying to get some rest, since they got up at 4:00 AM to take buses for two hours to get there by 6:00 AM, to get in line for an appointment at 11:45 or 2:30.

One needs to get the weight and blood pressure and temperature taken care of, on one’s own, in the interim waiting time to see the doctor, unless one wants to make the hospital visit into an all day affair.    Any tests, or visits, that are not completed by 12:00 cannot be done until 1:30 PM or after.   Why?     Because the entire damn hospital closes down for 90 minutes, at 12:00, for lunch.    The hospital closes down, like maybe a restaurant that closes for a couple of hours between the end of lunch and the start of dinner.    The place that was teeming with humanity at 11:55 is like a ghost town at 12:15.   At 1:25, it will be teeming, again.    Of course, anyone in line at 12:00 when the doors slam shut can reserve their place in line at 1:30.    Right.   No.    Even the line to pay, to give the hospital money, closes down.   Now that is efficiency.

The line to pay for the visit is usually not too long, maybe five or ten or fifteen people in front of you, and it moves reasonably quickly.   Maybe wait in line five or ten minutes, or a little longer.   But there can be complications.

One time, the doctor wrote down the wrong id number for the procedure we were to get – I dunno, maybe she wrote down a number for “amputate both legs,” instead of “regular office visit.”

Not sure.   But the cashier, ever precise, caught the mistake.   The fee written down by the doctor was 5 yuan short.  The hospital would have lost 5 yuan in that event, not to mention maybe Qing’s loss of legs.    I graciously offered to pay the 5 yuan right then, change the procedure order number right there at the cashier, but there is no getting around the procedural maximization in the hospital.  

Maybe you can guess.   We had to go back up to see the doctor, to make the doctor correct her serious error.    We rejoined the pleading, bleating mob in front of the doctor’s desk, and in only about 15 minutes we had made the doctor correct the id number for the procedure.   No doubt, surrounded as she was by medical records and pleading women, she felt severely chastised by the downstairs cashier for making such an egregious error.   No doubt the doctor will never make that mistake again.    Cost to us in time, standing in line the first time, arguing with the moron cashier, going back upstairs to get the id number corrected, waiting to see the doctor again, going back downstairs to pay again, about 45 minutes.

You remember Steve Martin as the weatherman in Los Angeles, in LA Stories.  His life was without care, the weather was always perfect, and he was … bored.  Bored Beyond Belief, is what he wrote on his window pane – BBB.  I am coining a new term, SBB, for procedural … complexity … in China.   Stupid Beyond Belief.    This fee snafu is a relatively minor example of an SBB moment.    We can call it SBB – minor.

After getting the procedure number corrected, we went back downstairs, stood in line, paid 25 yuan, instead of 20 – about $0.50 difference – and went off to get the blood test.

It is not so easy to find aspirin in china.   For some reason, aspirin seems to be  one of those western things that don’t fit with Chinese culture.  I don’t know why – there is certainly mystery about how it works.   American pop aspirin like … well, aspirin.  Chinese don’t.   But blood tests are a different story.

Chinese do blood tests for … everything.   If you come to the hospital for a cold, you get a blood test.   If you complain of feeling badly, you get a blood test.   I am pretty sure that if you complained that you did not have enough blood, the hospital would ….  

Pregnant women get frequent blood tests.   I am not medically savvy to know what they are testing for, so continuously, but the process is one of the scariest things I have seen in China.   Regardless of the hospital, the procedure seems the same.    Call it another SBB – minor, unless by mistake it becomes an SBB – major.

The blood test stations are designed to maximize throughput.    There are ten to twenty service stations, behind a long window, at which technicians, not doctors or nurses, take blood test after blood test after blood test.   There is room to insert your arm beneath the thick glass wall separating you from the technician.  Sort of like transactions in a currency exchange in a dangerous neighborhood, or the takeout fried chicken place at 75th and Yates on the south side of Chicago.  Just enough room to insert your arm for the withdrawl, which takes all of about ten seconds.  The Hangzhou No.1 hospital across the street has a line system – get in line at one of the stations, wait for your test.    Waiting time in line, ten to 30 minutes.   Very democratic, though.   Everyone gets in line.   If you have a cold, and are coughing badly, get in line behind the pregnant woman lying on a hospital bed, who is behind the crying baby who looks about to explode or the guy bleeding rather a lot from a head wound.    No special treatment in the blood test line.

The Pregnant Women’s Hospital is much more sophisticated.   No need to stand in line.  You can get a number from a machine, like the old “take a number”  in the delicatessen.   There are chairs in the blood test room, probably 50.   There are, of course, a couple of hundred women waiting for blood tests at any one time, so the chairs are guarded like money.   The result is that instead of standing in line, women are standing – not in line, but sort of milling around.    More sophisticated.   Feels less … socialist.  First come, first served.  Logistics people call it a FIFO inventory system – first in, first out.  All stored inventory is the same.  No special treatment, regardless.

Since some of the blood tests are needed, immediately, there is great pressure to get the test done.   The technicians swab a little alcohol, plunge in the needle, remove what they need based on the paper given to them by the patient, stick on a label, wipe off the counter, and process the next victim.

There are hundreds of blood test samples being routed to testing every hour, with a fair amount of human handling in between.    No chance for error here, right?   No one puts the wrong label on a tube, or reads the wrong instructions for the test, or types the wrong results in the computer?    It is China, you know, where everyone is very precise, down to the 5 yuan.    I am pretty sure that the official medical statistics, at least, do not mention any missteps in the blood test confusion.

There is another room, to get weighed.   Now this is not a precision “test,” even in the US.   The doctor does not really need to do the weighing, and in China, the doctor does not.   You do this, yourself, along with blood pressure test and temperature taking.   You can write down the results, or remember them.   The doctor will take your word for it.   After all, you are the patient, and you should take some responsibility for your health care. 

The temperature taking is easy.   You don’t need to worry about cleanliness of thermometers or ear probes.   The hospital doesn’t have any.   You bring your own thermometer.   If it is dirty, that is your problem.   Personal responsibility.

I am not sure how to game the temperature system – if I needed my temperature taken, not sure if I would want to estimate high or low.   After all, the temperature is measured in Celcius, not Fahrenheit, with only 100 gradations between freezing and boiling of water, instead of 212.   That means that a difference of 1 degree does mean more here than it does in the US.   Do I want to tell the doctor my temperature is 37 degrees or 38 degrees on the relatively unclear thermometer?   That one degree has meaning here.    It is the difference between 98.6 and 100.7.   My answer hinges on whether I think it is better to go home untreated or stay and be treated at the hospital.    Which would be better for my health?   Personal responsibility, again.

Perhaps everyone’s fondest memories of pregnancy are getting the ultrasound.   It is a time for a minor amount of personal attention, and you get to see what it is that is making all the fuss and the kicking, and start developing a connection.   A little personal time – mom, dad, baby.

As in the US, the ultrasound exam is done in a little room, with the technician but only with the mom.   The exam is five to ten minutes, maybe a bit less than in the US, but ok.   The process is really special, and memorable for every pregnant mom.   This is what the process is like.

The ultrasound testing office opens about 8:30.    As you recall, for the blood tests, everyone gets a “take a number”  ticket from a machine, and comes back when the big display shows that their number is coming up.  That is for blood tests.

It would be possible to do that for the ultrasounds, but that must be too simple an idea.   There is something more complicated going on that I must not be able to see with my western eyes.

So pregnant women, and their moms or husbands, start lining up about 6:00 in the morning to “get a number”  from the woman behind the desk in the ultrasound office.    By 8:30 there are – every day – two hundred or so women, each with their two or three attendants, in line around the entire mezzanine second floor.   We might have been waiting to go in for our interview on Ellis Island.  People propped against walls, lying down, carrying bags of lunch and maybe blankets and ubiquitous water bottles.  Three, six, nine months pregnant. Again, there are a few chairs, but …  This is the office designed to do ultrasounds.  With – presumably – some consideration of demand in mind.

Understand, the pregnant women are not in line to get an ultrasound.   They are in line to get a number that schedules the ultrasound.    As with every other department, the ultrasound office closes for lunch.    Some people who arrive late to stand in line – 7:30, say, an hour before the office opens – get a number for the afternoon, maybe 3:30.   There are only so many ultrasounds that can be done in one day.  There are no appointments.  People standing too far back in line do not get a number, after standing in line for an hour or so, maybe traveling a long way by bus to get here.   They don’t get a number for tomorrow.   They come back, and stand in line tomorrow.    This does great things for efficiency, particularly if the husband steals a day off from work to make the trip with his wife.

If you get a number for 3:30 in the afternoon, then, you count your lucky stars.    You can now relax for six hours or so, until your ultrasound number comes up.    This is such a special time for all moms.   More grinding.

What is being optimized?  Cannot tell.  But the hospital designers certainly had ultrasounds in mind at the time of design.  The hospital is not that old.  The first principles of design are to consider end users in design – how many bathrooms, how many elevators of what size, what size offices for how many doctors … maybe even how many pregnant women might be standing in line to get a number at 6:00 AM.  This is just supply and demand for architects.  Chinese design, in every hospital I have been to, and that is about eight, fails miserably in consideration of demand. 

I probably don’t need to tell you that the ultrasound, rather than the sort of quiet personal time with your baby-to-be-born that we know in the west, is a chaotic mess of a  time.    No doctor and mom looking at the head, and heart, and fingers.   No warm exchange of hopes for the future and love for the child to be born.     Processing people through the system is the goal.   People do not matter.  The System matters.

A key difference with the west, certainly the US, is that husbands are not allowed in the ultrasound room.   Mystery must be maintained. Husbands are not allowed due to  the Chinese one-child policy.    As you know, China has had a one-child policy, in variations, since before 1980.    The desire for a male child has led to millions of abortions of female fetuses.    To combat that, hospitals and their workers are instructed to not reveal the sex of a fetus.   A female might be aborted, particularly if the father learns that the fruit of his sperm is female.    Having the husband in the ultrasound room, able to look at the ultrasound screen, might be able to see the tell-tale signs of a male – or not.    In any case, families are usually not able to plan for a boy, or a girl, by buying clothes and toys and other things in advance.    Mystery is preserved, until the time that the State releases its control of information.

You might get the idea that in the mass of confusion in any hallway of the hospital – women in a line completely around the mezzanine floor for ultrasounds, and to see the doctor, and get blood tests, and  running (as it were) up and down the escalator to pay fees and correct mistakes, and go to the bathroom, and weigh themselves, and try to get something to eat after the blood test, and sleeping, and women about to give birth, and women having just given birth being wheeled through the traffic – in this chaos – that the hospital might be tempted to skimp on cleaning.     That would be wrong, sort of.

Cleaning, or at least the physical manifestations of cleaning, are going on all the time.   Cleaning ladies are sweeping people out of their way with mops and brooms, and moving cleaning buckets through the hallways.   This work could be done at lunch, when everyone else disappears, or in the evening,  but I think that would not convey the sense of cleaning that is key.   It is the appearance that is important, not the result.   And it contributes to the sense of chaos, and urgency, which is key to the grinding.   How can we pay attention to you, when we have all This going on around us?  Battlefield conditions.

When we got the amniocentesis test – which was strongly discouraged by the doctor –  Qing was asked to lie on a small hospital bed for about half an hour before going home.  During that time, a nurse came by to take blood pressure, and do a minor ultrasound, and everything was kept clean and sanitary throughout the procedure.   Except that right adjacent to the nurse doing our ultrasound was a cleaning lady, with a rag that looked like one of my old shirts, wiping down all the surfaces on the table where the instruments were.   The cleaning lady did not spit on the floor, or blow her nose into the rag, but I doubt that would have worsened the sanitary conditions.    But when mystery is key, and power is maintained, then form over substance becomes a virtue.    Like Fernando Lama, a la Billy Crystal, it is more important to look good than to feel good.

I think military people will say that even in battlefield conditions, it is possible to get excellent care in battlefield hospitals.   Doctors answer questions, as best they can.   No doubt they try to give the wounded some hope for recovery, as seems reasonable. 

But one of the most surprising things about medical care in China is the honesty of doctors.  This is translated as their willingness to say, in response to the simplest question about diagnosis, or prognosis,  “I don’t know.”    In the US, occasional use of this phrase might be interpreted as thoughtful and careful.    Pretty regular use would be interpreted as stupid.   But one hears that phrase over and over again, from doctors in China.   I prefer to think that the doctors here are not stupid, so I am rooting for honesty.    Maybe not well trained, maybe lazy, maybe just extraordinarily careful with what they say, but not stupid.    “I don’t know” is the answer to give in China when you want to cut off further discussion.   To ask a follow up question, like, for example, “Why the hell don’t you know?”  would be impertinent.     The cut-off-discussion answer to, “Why”  is often the curt and dismissive,  “No why.”

So, after one of our blood tests, the doctor saw that one of the blood sugar levels was high.   The doctor told Qing that she had pregnancy-related diabetes.  This can be a pretty serious matter, health for mother and baby.   The doctor prescribed a series of blood tests, three per day for three days, and all to be done two hours after eating, so roughly 11:00 in the morning,  3:00 in the afternoon, and about 9:00 at night.   Go to the hospital three times a day.  Pain in the ass.

Qing had had blood tests before.   No blood sugar problems were noted.   She had eaten before this blood test, which was ok in this case, but had a lot of stress in getting to the hospital on buses and waiting in line (I was in Chicago at the time).    The doctor did not have time, I suppose, to consider those factors.   So, a series of blood tests occupying the whole day for three days, plus the worry that goes along with blood sugar problems being passed on to the baby.    Looking up “pregnancy related diabetes”  online, reading about possible severe consequences.

No one considered that there is absolutely nothing in Qing’s history to suggest a blood sugar level problem.   She eats nutritious food, not too much by any means.  No weight problem.   She eats almost no sugar.   Previous blood tests were normal.   The day of the abnormal blood test, the stress of the day was abnormal (stress can trigger a high blood sugar level, as does eating).   And the abnormal result was only a little bit abnormal.  If the doctor had five minutes to ask a question, or consider the case, ask what Qing had for breakfast, or, maybe, physically look at Qing, she might have had another idea.  But no one thought about this.

We got two days of the blood tests, at 11, 3, and 9.   Don’t ask about logistics of getting them.  All results came back normal.   Went back to the doctor in about a week, brought the blood test results (you maintain your own medical records in China.   Doctors and hospitals don’t do that.   Again, personal responsibility for medical care).     Doctor said everything looked fine, and Qing did not have diabetes.    What could have caused the one abnormal test?   “I don’t know.”   Other than what she ate that morning, or the timing of the test after eating, or extra stress.   An erroneous test result, perhaps?    The doctor obviously did not have time to look it up on Wikipedia.  

 By the way, our doctor came to us via some excellent guanxi.  Many women with excellent connections were also vying with us in the lines.

So if looking for optimization in health care, we are back to mystery.   Some system, some procedural value, could be optimized, but I can’t see it myself.    Not the doctor’s time, not the efficiency of the fee collection, not the minimizing of medical error.    Not the time or care of the patients.   It is quite clear, from all hospital experience, that people’s time has no value in this system.   The procedural system might be maximizing the number of jobs, but there are too many things that get done by machine that could be done by people, if desired, and one does not get the overstaffed-and-underworked sense of employees in hospitals that one gets in some other systems in China.

And perhaps my western mind just doesn’t see what is going on.   It often seems that Chinese are playing a different game, a bigger game, than we are used to confronting.    So maybe system design is not about maximization, but about conservation.   Perhaps system design is not optimizing anyone’s interests, even those of long-gone bureaucrats.   Perhaps optimization is not now, and never has been, the goal.   The goal, perhaps, is something bigger.   What is the takeaway from the incidents of confusing building layout, process preservation, paperwork adoration, standing in line for hours, inability  to schedule appointments, inability to check a result with a phone call or an email, and inability to ask questions? 

What clearly is being conserved is the grinding.   The grinding down of personality, of rage at stupidity, of the sense that things should work better.   It is the poverty of imagination.   The system is conserved.    Maslow is right – self preservation is always the first and foremost priority.    Hospitals in China never go out of business, and clearly don’t compete.   The system grinds slowly, but it grinds exceedingly fine.   The system truly is god-like. 

The Light Touch of No Government Regulation

Summer, 2011 

In the socialist economy of China, government regulation is often as derided, or ignored, as in any of the tea party fantasies coming out of prole-land or Romney-Ryanville.

A key example is elevator operation in China, particularly in the non-western oriented buildings  (meaning buildings that have Chinese oriented businesses, not buildings that don’t have a western wall on the outside).    I can’t really speak to elevator safety, or emergency situations.   I don’t inspect limit switches, or floor leveling software, or cables, or brakes.   I have seen some heat-activated floor selection buttons, which have long been a no-no in the heavily regulated US, but what I really want to talk about is elevator floor selection software.

Back in the good old days, elevator floor selection programs were one of the homework problems for simulation courses in system dynamics.    You have several floors, and varying demands for service coming from those different floors, and pretty much everyone wants to go either up or down.   But some people on one floor could have demands to go up, and others to go down.   And some demand is to go all the way down, and some demand is to go down one floor.  And you could satisfy some of the down demand by chance, as it were, if someone on an upper floor happens to want to get off on a floor where someone who wants to go down is waiting to get on.  And you can have an elevator that has satisfied all its demand, the market for elevator service has cleared, and now the elevator is free as a bird, to do as it wishes.   What should it do?   And you have limited supply of elevators.   You want to serve your customers in the least time – or some other optimization.     It actually is a fairly complicated market problem.

I have absolutely zero knowledge of current US elevator operating software.  No doubt by this time, the programs used in the US are so standard that the tweaking is about how long the doors should stay open, and the tweaking is done by some two year community college graduate in Bangalore.

But you can see the heavy hand of the government in the heavily regulated markets in the US.   Ever try to use the “door close”  button in a US elevator?   Has this button ever worked on an elevator in the US, in the last forty years?   Why do we even have this button, except as a way to frustrate people, and remind them of the heavy hand of the government in the nanny state – “no, you can not choose to close the door faster, because someone might have their feelings hurt by the automatic-safety-sensor-door hitting their purse as YOU try to close the door.”  In China, the “door close”  button works, everywhere, and it works great.

Market fundamentalism works.    Is there demand for the door to close?  Ok, close the door!   No waiting and speculating about how someone’s feelings might be hurt.   Satisfy the demand.

Now I will admit to different operating conditions in China.   There are four times the number of people as in the US, and between 8:45 and 9:00 on a weekday morning, probably half of the Chinese population is trying to get on the elevator to go to work.   And one cannot design the market system to handle the peak demands.   I mean, even at the heavily regulated parking in suburban US shopping malls, there is sometimes no place to park on those peak days before Christmas.   Sometimes, the market just does not clear in a reasonable amount of time, even with government supervision.

And perhaps my experience is unusual, having lived here for only three years and really used, repeatedly, elevators in only about four different buildings.    I can’t claim operating experience in a statistically significant sample of Chinese elevators.   So don’t treat this as a scientific study;  it is anecdotal, only.   Caveat emptor.

But in China, elevator floor selection software is clearly written with the free market in mind.    Yes, the “door close” buttons work;  but it is far more market-friendly for the elevator cab than that.   Supply makes the rules.   No wishy-washy Keynesianism for the elevator cab.    You want me to provide supply for your elevator demand?  Play by my supply rules.

I have figured out the basic operating principle for free market elevator service in China.    It is, in fact, the Marshall Field dictum – the customer is always right.   The current customer, that is.    The customer you have now, in front of you, inside the elevator, is always right; anyone pushing a button on some other floor is only a potential customer;  you don’t know when demand from that customer will just fade away, and you stop and there is no one there.   So, stick with the customer you have, and don’t worry about the future.    Short termism.     That future customer might decide to go to the bathroom while waiting, and you stop, and the demand is gone.  In the meantime, you are delaying your current customer;  don’t do that.    That potential future customer could do something else – walk up or down a floor, and not tell you, the elevator operating software, about their changed behavior; or they could decide to take the elevator in a different building, or something.    No.  Don’t respond to speculative demand.   Dance with who brung you.

US government regulation would probably require some balancing of demand, and consideration of the feelings and the waiting time of the potential customers, and more such.   So there would be more stopping, and more weighing of the demands from future customers.   Not here.

So let me tell you about getting to my regular Wednesday morning location, the architect/engineering office GA in Hangzhou.    Today was a bit unusual, but not so much.

Went to Starbucks early, got some coffee and looked at some blogs and email.  Left for GA.   It took about 20 minutes to get to the GA offices, in heavy traffic about 8:30.   Distance of the GA offices from the Starbucks, about a mile.  But, rush hour traffic,  Ok.     Traffic in China is also free market oriented, but that is another story.

Parked in the basement garage of the office building where GA is located.   Parked on the B2 level, the lower basement, since that is where the unassigned parking is.    Usually, I get to park in one of the surface spots just adjacent to the main building entry, but today, at 8:50, the parking spots outside the building were filled with people (demand) waiting to get on one of the 5 elevators (supply).    In a sign of creeping government regulation in China,  the building manager has changed the way in which elevator demand at the first floor is satisfied.    In the good old days of a few months ago, when markets ruled, the appearance of supply (an elevator door opens) meant a wild dash for the door.   A hundred people would rush the door, and the strongest and closest to the door when it opened would have their demand satisfied.   (People getting off the elevator are former customers of the elevator, so they are old news.   Screw ‘em.   They have to fight their way out from the people rushing in.   Sometimes, I think people wanting to get off just don’t make it.   Not nimble enough for the market. The same is true, of course, for people getting off the subway train.)

Now, the building management has put in red velvet line control ropes, and everyone has to queue up, one by one, to get on the next elevator.   Hence, in the good old days, with survival of the fittest demand satisfaction, all the demand could fit in the elevator lobby in tight balls of humanity.   No one dared stand more than an inch from the person in front of them, or someone would use the free market to cut into the crowd in front of you.  Now, probably with government regulation creeping in, everybody in long straight lines, the demand at the first floor spills out of the building lobby into the parking lot spaces outside, where I would normally park.

GA is on the 11th floor.   I park in the subbasement.  I have 13 floors to go.

I push the elevator button on the B2 level, and wait.   For a while.  

As an American, conditioned to regulation,  I know elevator demand is being satisfied upstairs, I should wait my turn, so some delay is unfortunately necessary.

After about ten minutes, now about 9:00, I get a stirring.   Some long hidden, free market impulse comes over me.    I can play this game.   I am going to outsmart the market.   I will walk up, not to the first floor, where demand is still heavy, but to a different floor, say the 5th floor, where I can guess that some people will be leaving, and upward demand will be pretty close to zero.    Floors 2, 3, or 4 might not be high enough to ensure that some demand will be getting off, but by the 5th floor, I am pretty confident of getting my demand satisfied.

Now that is 7 floors, but in free market China, that is not a problem for most people.  I have seen 7 and 8 floor walk up apartment buildings, so I don’t feel too bad being part of the market demand. 

At 5, I get out of the stairway, and confidently wait for the elevator to satisfy me.   And, sure enough, an up supply elevator soon stops.  Success!

But, you know, the free market isn’t free.   Even in China, there are weight limits to elevator cabs, and when the weight limit is reached, the bell rings, and the elevator won’t move until someone gets off.   And Chinese are actually rather remarkably good about the last person who gets on taking responsibility for getting off, if the elevator cab decides that she weighs a kilogram too much.  Social mores.  And the elevator cabs, knowing that they are the only source of supply, can be pretty finicky about the weight limits.

But we have to keep in mind that market for elevator service works in favor of the elevator, not the customers.   Even free markets have rules, and the rules are written by the friends of the elevator cab, not the customers.  

The pretty full elevator cab stops for me at the 5th floor, and the door opens, but no one gets off.   I try to get on, but the bell rings, and I step off.   Have to wait for more supply, later.

But sometimes, the elevator cab decides that even with no one getting on, it just seems all a bit too much, and the supply chain breaks down.   I don’t get on, but the elevator weight limit bell rings anyway, and the elevator won’t move.   So a girl who probably got on at the first floor gets off, to ease the load on the poor overworked elevator cab.   But the cab is still not happy, and the bell rings again, and the cab won’t move.   So another girl gets off, and the cab is happy, and the door closes.

We now have three of us standing on the 5th floor, waiting to go up.   It is about 9:15 by this point, but demand is still heavy.

The first girl is smart, and finds a way around the market.   She pushes the down button, and supply appears, and she and I ride down to the first floor.  Our other 5th floor companion declined to join us, and waited on 5.  At the first floor, the horde tries to get on.   But we are on the elevator, so too bad for them.   A few of them make it. 

The rest of the ride is uneventful, except on the way up, we stop at 5, for the girl who did not join us on the ride down.   She tries to get on, but the weight bell rings.   Her demand will have to wait until even later to be satisfied.    You have to be quick-witted to survive in the elevator market.

So there you have the glory of market fundamentalism.   Supply tries to satisfy demand, and the market eventually clears, but those most willing to pay, with shoulder pushes and quick wit, still have an advantage over the “queue up” government regulators.    And I now have the advantage of morning exercise, walking up seven floors.   It really is the best of all possible worlds.

Got to GA about 9:25.   Took longer to get up to the 11th floor than to drive to the building in heavy traffic.    But I am happy, because I feel I was able to outsmart the elevator floor selection software design market fundamentalists.

I can play this game.

Shibboleth

October 2007 and Spring, 2015 

The first time was in 2007, in Dalian, one of my favorite cities.

One of my students – government officials from China – was showing me her hometown, and we were late night driving from Dalian to our next stop that would take me to the airport in the morning.

She was not driving.  Her driver did that, so we had plenty of time to talk.  And there were two other of my students in the van, and we moved from topic to topic about China and the US and national monuments and American history and  9-11 and terrorism in China and the US.   And I said that the 9-11 terrorists missed the most important target – the Statue of Liberty.

The government officials had just spent a year in Chicago, learning about markets and government management in the US, and many of them had become personal friends and they had just returned to their home, and I was visiting.  A lot of them were sad to leave Chicago. They had had a year of new experiences and fun and learning on the government’s dime, and they were going back to pressure and anxiety.

But like a lot of people in China, my government students were looking at American schools for their kids and openness and a life free of the kind of stress they were all returning to.

And I talked about the history of the Statue of Liberty.  From France. And in New York Harbor, facing southeast, to Europe.  And the Emma Lazarus.

And we were hurtling through the night, 10,000 kilometers from home, all of us nostalgic, me a little homesick, talking softly even in the warmth among friends, and the word just poured out.

Give me your tired, your poor

(Friends, from different backgrounds)

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free

(And now different lives facing us tomorrow)

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore

(Nostalgia, wanting to turn back the clock)

Send these, the homeless, tempest tossed, to me

(And for some, even with serious jobs and bright futures, muffled anxiety and a wish that might become a reality again, someday)

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

I could go back, they could not.   Tomorrow, I could get on a plane, and they could not.   They had lives, good ones, great ones, family, friends, future, security, money.   But I could go, and they absolutely could not. 

The sign, the password to the plane was American.   As in,  I am an American.   And I could go back to a place where, once inside, there was no password, no test, no badge of admission to the school or the city hall, no code of arms or card or letter of introduction that gave me benefits and not the other guy. 

And it was impossible not to tear up at that moment.   Ten thousand kilometers from home, among friends who were staying home, not reluctantly but inevitably, but everyone in the car felt a tug.

Believe me, you should try it sometime.

Everyone in China has a password or a loyalty test or shibboleth to master.  Not a phrase, or a card.  But access always requires a password.  Somebody knows somebody.  In China, it is like Milt Rakove said, we don’t want nobody nobody sent.

And the second time.  In the fall of 2014, and into 2015, the Chinese government was cracking down hard on foreign web sites, and foreign email addresses, and almost anything that was foreign.  Foreign businesses targeted for investigations, foreign products assailed. 

In the new shopping mall ten minutes from our home, there was – for reasons unknown – a 25 foot statue of liberty, complete, for about two years. A new shopping mall for modern Chinese, with modern ideas. 

In spring of 2015, it disappeared.   Times are reminiscent – for some Chinese – of 1966, the beginning of the Cultural Revolution.  The hammer is coming down everywhere – on foreigners, on Chinese.   And it was time to … come home.

One of my computers had already been fried by the government – no internet access at all anymore, anytime.   And my undergrad foreign students were in danger of failing a course because papers they emailed to me had been blocked by the Chinese government, and I could not email them in return to say whether I had received their paper or not. 

I had a CD set of the tv show West Wing, and I was watching episode 8 of season 2.  Now you know the writing and acting in West Wing was just about the best ever done on television, so finding a heart-string pulling scene is not tough.

And the story was about 96 Chinese Christians who had stowed away in a shipping container, six weeks on the ocean, 13 dying en route, to get to America and freedom from religious persecution.  

I was listening to President Bartlet practice the Thanksgiving proclamation –

Well over three and a half centuries ago, strengthened by faith and bound by a common desire for liberty, a small band of pilgrims sought out a place in the new world …

and a pause…  

… where they could worship according to their own beliefs …

and a pause…  

… Now therefore, I, Josiah Bartlet, President of the United States by virtue of the authority and laws invested in me do hereby proclaim this to be a national day of Thanksgiving.

 And then, to his aide Josh Lyman –

Let me tell you something … we can be the world’s policeman, we can be the world’s bank, the world’s factory, the world’s farm … what does it mean if we’re not also …. 

 Almost breaking up –

They made it to the new world, Josh …

You know what I get to do now?   I get to proclaim a national day of  thanksgiving….

To avoid an international incident, Bartlet, with some assistance from a remarkably lax guard at the stowaways temporary holding rooms, provided an entre to another new world where there was no password or loyalty test needed.  He convinced himself of the sincerity of their faith by using a shibboleth, giving 83 people access to a place where they no longer needed one.

And we do wish that life could imitate art.

Go ahead, watch the two clips.

Moller Villa

October, 2008 

You will all like this one, Rob particularly.   I am staying at the Moller Villa in Shanghai, which was a family home built by a Swedish/English shipping magnate in the 1930’s for his daughter.  The story is that the daughter envisioned living in a fairy tale castle, and her father proceeded to comply with her wish.  The villa, interior and exterior, is phenomenal – beautiful brickwork and wonderful carved wood, like in some European… well, castle.  The villa was used in turn by both the Guomindang and the Gongchandang (Nationalists and Communists) after 1945 – no reason for leaders of any stripe to stint on luxurious surroundings. 

 

Source: Legolas1024 [CC BY-SA 4.0  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)],from Wikimedia Commons


Moller villa is now a small hotel.  The staff is even more than the usual Chinese attentive, almost obsequious.   I don’t know whether to respond to the constant “Thank you for coming” and “Have a nice day” or just ignore them.  Am I encouraging them by responding or showing a western lack of respect by ignoring them?    Are they thinking about this as much as I am?

Breakfast is held in the dining room of this incredibly elegant villa.  The room is frightfully smart and polished, with tasteful amounts of marble (apparently, tasteful use of marble was once possible in China) and carved wood ceilings and moldings and inlaid parquet floors.    And the staff is the usual Chinese redundancy- there are four young girls in qipao(s? – no plural in Chinese, but this is pinyin … oy. complicated) at the front entrance to say hello and welcome and this way and good morning- I think each person has one assigned phrase, and that is their job.

One could say the hotel is overstaffed.  When you ask for coffee, this is a two person delivery job.  Someone brings the coffee from the kitchen halfway to the table.  Not kidding.   It’s not like they are carrying the coffee two hundred yards, and someone’s legs get tired.  But at the halfway point in the dining room, someone else takes the coffee off the tray of the first guy, and brings it all the way to the table, BY HIMSELF, and puts it down.  (Thankfully, there is someone else to attentively put the spoon facing the right way on the saucer, and adjust anything on the table that might have gotten out of place by the mere fact of my using it).

So one of the breakfast choices is an omelette, which is okay- green onions and red and green peppers and mushroom and maybe a little bacon- everything is cut up so fine they have obliterated the ability to distinguish meat from vegetable- and the omelette is delivered, via relay team from the kitchen, on a fine china plate, and set tastefully on the table.   The omelette is sitting on a drizzled dark red sauce, looking very sophisticated and proper, until you taste the sauce, expecting some exotic combination of flavors, only to discover that the drizzled sauce is…. ketchup.

Sometimes it is better to squint than to know all the details.

Update – In 1910, Eric Moller took over the Asian part of their family shipping business, later expanding to Shanghai.  By 1953, the company abandoned their mainland Chinese operations, and relocated to Hong Kong.  

The villa is on every higher-end tourist site.  But the government travel site http://www.china.org.cn/travel/   contains an error.   From the web site –

In 2006, the hotel was ostensibly “closed for repairs” while in fact being used as the headquarters of a corruption investigation into Shanghai’s top official, Party Secretary Chen Liangyu.  It was said that the fairyland villa turned into a nightmare for many corrupt officials who thought that they had been invited there for a “cup of coffee.”  The villa hotel did not reopen to guests until April 2009.  http://www.china.org.cn/travel/travelogue/2009-05/20/content_17804418_2.htm

 

I stayed at Moller Villa in October of 2008, six months before the reopening, per the government web site. Maybe they didn’t see me as a guest, or maybe I was a decoy, or maybe the reservation, made for me by one of my government students, was itself a guanxi thing.  I didn’t see many other people staying there.   Didn’t see any officials looking nervous.  Anyway, reading this, the Chinese government will no doubt be happy to correct their error. 

American History, and a Memorial

October, 2010 

When Rob Mier died, in 1995, a good part of the national progressive community, in academia and neighborhoods, felt the loss.   Rob was not simply an academic – professor of urban planning and policy at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and head of the Center for Urban Economic Development, a research unit in public policy and community development.    “Not simply” because other teachers, at other schools, could match his academic pedigree.   But Rob was … more.   He was a professional engineer (a piece of his past that he used to great advantage in meetings and negotiations with government planning officials) and had a passion for activism in community development.   Theory, yes, but always balanced with real community action. 

He was also a rugby player, and that is where Rob and I met, playing for the Chicago Lions.   Several of us spoke at Rob’s life celebration, and I pointed out that his own memories of his own rugby exploits never quite seemed to match our own memories of his exploits, but I put that down to his continuing passion for life. 

Passion in Rob was not of the fire-breathing variety.   He was quiet, not physically imposing, and I never remember his voice rising much above conversation level.   But he had a passion for truth, and social justice, and he used his engineering and academic training to help promote better services, better economic conditions, better communications, and better lives for people in neighborhoods in Chicago. 

Rob used the standard Saul Alinsky model in thinking about organizing people in communities, although our work at the Center for Urban Economic Development was more technical and research support than it was activism in organizing.   We considered a lot of the techniques that a young Barack Obama must have used in community organizing in Chicago, including democratic management, worker coops, and community control of resources. 

Because of Rob and others at UIC, the department was known nationally as a locus of research and practice in community economic development and organizing people to take charge and solve their own problems.

Rob and I had similar credentials, although he was far more of an academic than I.   Both engineers, both interested in Chicago neighborhoods, both interested in bringing more sophisticated tools to  community development than simply organizing and arranging meetings.

He was about six or seven years older than me, and I considered him something of a mentor.

At Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, the international business program is taught all in English.  Students are mostly Chinese, with a few foreigners scattered in from time to time.   My courses, in economics and negotiation, fit pretty well with my background.   But in 2009, the ZUST civil engineering program opened its own international program, with promise of a degree from an American university (San Francisco State) for successful transfer students who could first demonstrate proficiency in American style courses.   Hence, the strange offering – the civil engineering program at ZUST was offering a one semester course in American History Since 1865 (to be followed by a course in American Politics).   If students could do well in those courses, then they might demonstrate some ability to do American university level  work.  There really was no one else at the school remotely qualified to teach this course.   I was less remote than anyone else.

International cooperation programs at Chinese universities can be tough to put together.   After all the usual difficulties in negotiation between schools, the reality on the ground can be daunting for a Chinese administration, accustomed to docile students and being in control of students’ academic and personal lives. 

A fundamental problem when foreign students arrive at the campus is that they are not Chinese.   In our case, they are from ten different countries in Africa, and about half a dozen different countries in Asia, plus India and Indonesia.   They arrive knowing nothing of Chinese culture, or language, and for most it is their first time away from parents and their own sense of restrictions.

The  international program in civil engineering is 20 Chinese students, 19 foreigners. 

A key requirement for entry to ZUST is that the foreign students know English.   And their English level is pretty good.   But there is no Chinese language requirement for admittance.   Should not be a problem, since all courses are supposed to be taught in English.  

But the foreign students are not Chinese, and the usual Chinese university administration way of addressing – or, not addressing – student concerns and complaints does not work so well.   There are a lot of complaints – Chinese students about the foreigners, foreign students about Chinese, both Chinese and foreign students about certain teachers and administrative practices.

Communication between the administration and foreign students is terrible.  That is partly Chinese cultural practice, partly lack of willingness to accommodate to the foreigners.   Students do not get university advises about days off from school, makeup classes, or schedule changes.  They must get that from their classmates, ad hoc.

Chinese students complain that foreign students get special treatment.  This is true, up to a point.   Foreign students get to leave the classroom early, not show up for class, and are still allowed to sit for exams.  Not true for Chinese.

Foreign students complain that Chinese students get special treatment.    Classes are supposed to be taught in English, but every now and then, or maybe more often, teachers slip into the vernacular when discussing chemistry, or physics, or mechanics.    Books are in English, but not all the teachers are fluent.   And the Chinese students are on their home turf, and can look thing up easily online. 

Most of the Chinese engineering students study hard.   They are jealous of the foreign students who make time to party.   The foreign students complain that the Chinese students are boring, don’t want to participate in events with them, and don’t help them study.   Chinese students complain that the foreign students always want help, when the Chinese students are working hard to understand the material themselves.

This is all on top of the usual cultural differences – Chinese as more quiet, less demonstrative, less vocal, less willing to point fingers and complain openly.   For the foreign students, particularly some of the students from Africa, such practices are cultural.   Not to mention the usual college age sexual tensions, which for the Chinese students must go absolutely unexpressed.

These students are now second year students, and they take all their classes together, so they know each other now.   The benefits and costs of being together are well known.  The complaints are well known.   The enemies are well known – mostly the university administration, but the group tensions are understood, even if unexpressed, at least by the Chinese. 

So here they are, second year students in a four year program, no one quite knew what they were getting into at the beginning, the carrot is the potential to go abroad for the last two years of school, or at least get a better and more diverse education than by not being together, but the sense of unfairness and, by now, helplessness, is palpable.   They are together, come what may, for the next two and a half years.   The foreign students could choose to leave, but a Chinese university is far cheaper than any other foreign alternative, and the education is better than staying at home in Africa, so they stay.   The Chinese students don’t really have the option of changing universities.   The foreign students have limited options in finding another English language engineering program in China.

The 39 of them are like sailors on a life raft – none of them wants to be quite where they are, they can see where they came from, but they can’t quite imagine how to change their situation.   Nobody wants to be the captain of the life raft.   Everybody wants to complain the raft is not going anywhere.   No one wants to pull the oars, let alone pull in one direction.

The foreign students have certainly been vocal in their complaints to the university administration.   ZUST is new at this international program business, and they certainly have a long way to go in understanding how to run one effectively.  But that doesn’t change the validity of some of the student complaints.   A poorly run program is not their fault. 

And there is nothing in Chinese culture that encourages swift and sympathetic response to complaint, particularly insistent complaint, really particularly by those lower in the hierarchy, especially by foreigners.   Both the Chinese students and the foreign students would be better off talking to a wall than to the university administration.

I have had some of my own complaints, about students.   Foreign students who do not show up for class, who leave early, who do no work.  This creates bad morale in my class, to say nothing of what it does generally among the Chinese sailors on the raft.   From what I have heard, some foreign students have received special treatment in other classes, and I don’t want to do that in mine.  

This is a class in American History Since 1865.   We are up to the Progressive Era.  We have discussed a lot of difficult elements of American history – slavery, reconstruction, black codes, Indian genocide, Chinese exclusion acts, segregation, union busting, government sympathy toward business in labor-business conflict, strikes, strike violence, factory conditions and living conditions.   We are using the standard textbook by Eric Foner, Give Me Liberty!, which emphasizes the long and difficult process of gaining liberty, the changing definitions of freedom, and who is entitled to the benefits of freedom.   America as a work in progress.   We have discussed labor organizing, and community organizing against unethical business practices, and farm organizations, and women’s rights organizations.   Given the time constraints, all pretty academic and abstract. 

I wanted a meeting with students to discuss expectations.   The university administration eagerly supported  that idea, I think because they knew more than I about the undercurrents.   The mechanics teacher would be at the meeting also, because she had some issues of her own to address, or she was there as moral support for me, or to watch me and report back to the administration. 

The meeting was last night, to start half an hour before my American history class, and given the nature of the discussions, I was willing to let the meeting go into scheduled class time if needed.  

The students actually had an agenda.   First up was an election.  The class leader, one of the girls in the class, had decided to resign, citing her work load.   Four of the 20 Chinese students gave little electioneering speeches, running for the vacant student leader job.   Voting was immediate, using a simple majority system.  No complicated, pairwise comparisons of candidates, A, B, C, and D.   We assumed transitivity of preferences, and consistent policy formulations among both candidates and voters.   I mean, really, it was just a student leader election.   Worry about Kenneth Arrow would have to wait for graduate school.

I expected the bulk of the agenda to be about me, or my class.  Too much work, not relevant to engineering, why are we doing this.  I was prepared with some Concept of the University comments, and community of scholars, and some future-job-prospect comments about the need for softer skills in management, and public speaking, and writing, and negotiation.

What happened was quite a surprise.

No one seemed to have particular complaints about my class.  Too much work, but ok.   In this group of students, there is no natural student leader.   Chinese students are accustomed to being told what to do, the foreign students want things done for them.   Everyone is happy to complain.

One student began talking about a problem, and another answered, but quickly the meeting descended into everybody shouting and talking with each other.   As  the teacher, I took it upon myself to exercise some control over the process.   One person talks, everybody listens.  

I suggested that there were a lot of tensions between students, not only students with the administration.   And, I suggested, unless they could talk about those tensions with each other, it would be easy for the administration to do nothing about any of their complaints.   They needed to speak with a single voice, and a unified approach.

We had some good airing of foreign and Chinese tensions.  Everyone acknowledged the problems.   No solutions, but some clearing of the air. 

But many issues, some easy to solve, some nothing, some more difficult. 

I said, “You have a lot of issues.  Too many.  Can you find one thing to work on?” 

All the students had complaints about the chemistry teacher.   Her English is poor, and even her Chinese manner of speaking is difficult for Chinese to understand.   All the students see big problems in this course.

We had a good fifteen or twenty minutes of complaints, about many things, but always coming back to chemistry.   Some of the foreign students wanted to strike.  Tell the administration that they would not come to class, until the teacher was changed.   I suggested that might not be a useful strategy. 

We are in the middle of the semester.   The students, even Chinese students, have been vocal about the need to change the teacher – now.  The students really could not imagine how little credence such a demand is given by the administration, in the middle of the semester, with a teacher who has a contract, teaching chemistry in a foreign language for, probably, not very much money.

But the demands continued last night.

After a while, it got boring.  It was clear to me that the administration had no desire to suddenly change teachers – it was not as if the chemistry department was loaded with extra English speaking teachers who wanted to take over a course mid-semester.

I told the students that.   Several times.   The chemistry class meets once a week, on Thursday.   I asked the students, you have no chance of changing teachers now.   What are you going to do to solve the problem?

“Change the teacher.”

“Not going to happen.  What are you going to do, Thursday?”

Nothing.

“How about if you do as I do in my negotiation class?  Sometimes, not always, but sometimes, I stop talking and ask the student leader to translate for the boys in the back of the classroom.  That seems to work pretty well.”

“It will take too long.  Class won’t cover the material.   Chinese students cannot always understand her.”

“Ok.  How about if you put your cell phone next to the lectern, and record the teacher’s voice?  Then you can replay it, as you wish.”

“Too slow, too much time, won’t get everything.  And when she slips into Chinese, does the foreign students no good.”

“Ok.  How about asking her to repeat, or slow down?”

“If she slows down in Chinese, what good?”

“Ok.  There are an infinite number of ways to solve any problem.   All you have to do is find one of them.   But the school is not going to solve this for you.   What are you going to do to solve this problem?    What are You going to do to solve this?” 

Nothing.   “You are going to be together for the next two and a half years.   You can have that be a good experience, or you can have meetings like this every week.   What do you want?”

Nothing.

“Ok.  Here is what you are going to do.  You are going to call the chemistry department at Zhejiang University (the big national university, about 45 minutes away, also called Zheda) and find a student, a Ph.D. student, or a Master’s degree student, or somebody, who knows chemistry and speaks English.   And you, all of you, are going to pay for that student to come here once a week and sit in the class and translate and interpret.”

“What?   We should pay money?   The school should do that.”

“The school will not do that.  You are going to pay, all of you, there are 40 of you, about 1 yuan a week to get some help.”

Grumbles and some recognition.

I pointed to one of the foreign students, who is a little plump.   “And 1 yuan per week is not going to force any of you to starve.”   A little humor helped.

“How do you find the phone number for the chemistry department at Zheda?

“dial 114.”

“Do it.  Now.”   Incredulous looks.  “Now?”   “Now.”   Got the number.   “Department is closed.”  

“Ok.  Tomorrow, you (the new student leader, and the foreign student leader) are going to go to Zheda, and find a student.   Understood?   Agreed?”

“If you can solve this one problem together, the maybe you can talk about problem number 2.  And then 3.   But right now, together, all of you, solve this one.”  

The group broke up into a dozen little meetings, and I moved from group to group, telling them repeatedly, “You have to solve this.  1 yuan each.  Solve the problem.”  

All agreed.   It was a breakthrough.  I think none of them had ever had the idea of solving their own problems before, certainly not through group action.   Certainly not by making the student leaders act like leaders.  The meeting did not break up until almost 9:00. 

We never got to the Progressive Era chapter.   But I think Rob Mier would be proud of me.   And maybe I taught a little American history after all.

https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/40520

https://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/hony-my-father/Content?oid=898033

Firemen are Firemen …

even in China …          Spring, 2011 

… although they are members of a national service, run out of Beijing, not by local governments.  So that is the reason for the army guys, not the police, doing traffic control when the local fire brigade ran through some training exercises yesterday.   But firemen are, down deep inside, guys, and high school guys at that.   So part of the training is a run, about 100 meters, with hose and connections.  At the end of the run, they have to hook up the hoses and put out a small electrical fire.  The water was already hooked up to a small pump, and came from our on-campus lake.

So at the signal, everybody took off from the starting line, just as if they were doing wind sprints at the end of football practice, and of course there was a big yell at the signal, and complaining during the run that somebody got a head start, and one guy dropped the hose at the signal, so he had to run again while everybody else laughed and watched him. 

The pumper is equipped with axes and sledges and pry bars and lots of hose.  You can see the cannon on top.  I think it is thoughtful of them to put the words on the truck door in both Chinese and English.   Otherwise, who would know?

 

A short time later, the fire department (different truck, though) came to do a fire rescue demonstration, or practice, at the school.   The concept was to rescue people from a burning or smoke filled room by letting them jump into an air cushion.  

All worked perfectly. The firemen got the cushion out and in place quickly.  The students who chose to jump, though – took them a while to get up the nerve.  I presume an actual emergency would act as a greater incentive.

 

Don’t think I have ever seen this practiced in the US.  And the likelihood of needing this assistance is low in China, where buildings are all concrete, except for some doors on classrooms,  and there is no wood or fabric in the school buildings, and no heat or air conditioning or even mechanical ventilation to cause smoke from a burned out motor.