Chinese Officials Threaten Mainland Parents of Student Attending Australian Protest
It is important to remember what we are dealing with. Let's review -
From the Sydney Morning Herald, August 7 - Chinese authorities approached the family of an international student who participated in high-profile protests at an Australian university and warned his parents of the potential consequences of political dissent.
Let's remember what we are dealing with ...
News reporting is so uneven. No mass shooting in the US is censored information in China - in fact, the news is prominently featured. From China Xinhua News on Twitter -
Shootings this weekend at a Texas Walmart and a bar in Ohio have left 30 people dead. Retail employees are taking to social media to say they're terrified to go to work. Workers fear getting shot at their workplace
Soft power? We don’t need no stinking soft power.
You remember the bandits in Treasure of the Sierra Madre - the bandit horde, pretending to be Federales, descending on Humphrey Bogart and fellow prospectors. “Badges? We ain’t got no badges. We don’t need no badges. I don’t have to show you no stinking badges.” The famous lines were uttered by Gold Hat, head of the bandits, when Fred C. Dobbs (Bogart) asked for their badges. Hong Kong was the soft power model, the badge of Chinese "peaceful rise." Mainland students and Confucius Institutes were supposed to be the badge of Chinese soft power in the world. But no more, as we see in Hong Kong, in Australian and New Zealand universities, and indeed, universities throughout the world.
No Wechat conversation is safe. Anytime. Anywhere. What Chinese are (not) talking about (4)
Wechat is almost universal. It is ubiquitous in China, and among the Chinese diaspora and their foreign friends and families. Its functionality for social media, news, and buying things makes it a better choice than any combination of applications available in the west. It is Twitter, Facebook, Googlemaps, Tinder and Apple Pay all rolled into one. And it is free.
Free does not mean without cost, of course, and in this case, the cost is the Chinese government being ready, willing, and able to monitor what you say, what you text, what you watch, what videos you post. In China and outside. If you think the long arm of Chinese government censorship doesn't reach into the US - well, you would be wrong.
Money Talks in the Clash of Civilizations
What else would you expect?
You remember Samuel Huntington’s article in Foreign Affairs in 1993 –
The central axis of world politics in the future is likely to be, in Kishore Mahbubani’s phrase, the conflict between "the West and the Rest" and the responses of non-Western civilizations to Western power and values…. The third alternative is to attempt to "balance" the West by developing economic and military power and cooperating with other non-Western societies against the West, while preserving indigenous values and institutions; in short, to modernize but not to Westernize.
Take a look at the three maps below.
Update at August 13 -
I wrote a bit about Epoch Times in the post below, mostly about Chinese getting their news from China news sources like public wechat. Epoch Times is most decidedly anti-CCP, and published by organizations related to Falun Gong, the same people who bring you Shen Yun, the extraordinary dance and performance troup that has been wow-ing Americans for a decade.
In the last two weeks, Epoch Times has been bombarding YouTube with two minute (two minute!) video advertising in advance of a video one is watching. The ads offer subscriptions to the newspaper, promising to expose the lies of the mainstream media in vilifying Donald Trump. Here is a screen shot from one subscription ad. "Honest news" is what they tout.
Donald Trump reads it every day. 'Nuff said. Chinese can get their "honest news" from Beijing or Falun Gong. Truly, only no news here is good news.
What Chinese are Talking About (3) - Love Mr. Xi, Love Mr. Trump
We know that mainlanders, particularly those in CCP, have a fondness for Mr. Trump. There are several reasons – Chinese historically have been willing to defer to strong leaders, and Trump projects arrogance, if not wisdom. It was clear before the 2016 election that if Trump won, Mr. Putin would win and Mr. Xi would also win. Events bear this out. There is no adversary so easy to fool as one convinced of his own superiority, particularly one with such poor justification. Flattery and artifice will get you … everywhere. For Chinese interested in foreign policy, all they need do is sit back and wait. Trump’s unforced errors – TPP, belittling allies, cozying up to dictators, removing US from environmental treaties, threatening friends and foes alike – make Chinese arrogance and Mr. Xi’s own unforced errors look positively innocuous. What’s not to love about someone willing to play the fool for you?
