Huawei - Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas
You know the meme – when you work with bad guys, you should expect to be labeled a bad guy. I mean no disrespect to the thousands of Chinese companies doing business across the world that manage to be profitable without intimate Chinese government relations. But in our globalized, internet era, it is impossible for a high tech company, particularly one as fundamentally important to internet networks, to not be tarnished with the specter of theft of intellectual property and CCP internet control and monitoring of Chinese businesspeople, students, even foreigners.
Probably no one outside a small group of analysts has the actual evidence of real dirt on Huawei. But that is the risk of being a national champion in China. If the government is promoting you, then there must be a government interest in promoting you, beyond just “go team.” This is simply Chinese practical reasoning.
But it seems that lying down with dogs is more than just a saying here. In his extraordinary Sinocism news blog, Bill Bishop continues the Huawei stories. From the February 9 edition, with no repetition in the stories (all should be clickable) -
Another update at July 24, 2019 - Boris Johnson became Prime Minister today. From the South China Morning Post -
Boris Johnson, Britain’s prime minister-designate, said his government would be very “pro-China”, in an interview with a Hong Kong-based Chinese-language broadcaster shortly before he was chosen to succeed Theresa May on Tuesday...
Speaking to Phoenix TV, Johnson backed Chinese President Xi Jinping’s infrastructure-based Belt and Road Initiative and said his government would maintain an open market for Chinese investors in Britain.
Crash out is now scheduled for October 31 - Halloween in the US, when goblins arrive.
Update on Peking U Ideological Battle January, 2019
In a recent post, The Ideology of Occupation, I described an ideological struggle being played out last month at Peking University, the combined Harvard-Yale of China. Now, a followup on what has happened to the "Old Marxist" students who questioned the manner in which CCP has been providing leadership of the proletariat. Spoiler - they are in jail.
The Ideology of Occupation January, 2019
In the last couple of weeks, two student groups were battling at Peking university, one of China’s most prestigious institutions. These were battles of words, not fists, but all the more intense for that.
Some might dismiss the conflict as a minor student skirmish over ideology. But the Chinese government reaction suggests that there is a lot more going on – that occupation by a ruling elite can have a light touch, except when it finds itself threatened. Existential threats, even small ones, must be put down.
To be sure, the conflict at Peking was not a contest for student body president, or a fight over which gendered pronoun to use in addressing a classmate. It was an ideological fight over who gets to interpret Marxism, and the fight illustrates the extent to which CCP, like every dynasty before it, can be understood as an occupying force. SupChina has the story- One Marxist student group is backed by the Party. The other's WeChat account is blocked
Source: Socialist Worker - A Time of turmoil shaped Karl Marx’s ideas
Single’s Day – Next Year in Xinjiang
A pair of sharply discordant messages about today's China came across my desk today, and I was left scratching my head. How are both these things part and parcel of China now?
One message came from a report from McKinsey that analyzed trends emerging from this year's "Single's Day" self-indulgent shopping mega-spree.
The other message arose from an expanding cascade of reports about the growing repression of China's Uighurs, and the ugly moral and spiritual vacuum -- and the expanding nihilism -- that are pervasively described in these reports.
External view of a Xinjiang "transformation through education" camp during construction Source: Bitter Winter
- Power (66)
- Era of Xi (54)
- CCP (35)
- Not in Kansas Anymore (33)
- Fear (31)
- US/China similar and different (25)
- Censorship, house arrest, brutality, extortion (22)
- Health, Education, Welfare (22)
- Language and Culture (21)
- Moral freedom (20)
- Policies, Foreign and Domestic (13)
- China Stories (12)
- Infrastructure and Planning (11)
- Disconnects (9)
- Exceptionalism – Chinese and American (9)
- Economics - Macro and Micro (8)
- Cultural Hegemony (7)
- Foreign policy (7)
- Mindfulness and Care (5)
- Occupation (4)
- Obligation (3)
- Belt and Road (2)
- US Universities – at home and in China (2)
- East Asia (1)
- Housing (1)